Loading…

Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT

Cone beam CT has a capability for the 3-dimensional imaging of large volumes with isotropic resolution, and has a potentiality for 4-dimensional imaging (dynamic volume imaging), because cone beam CT acquires data of a large volume with one rotation of an x-ray tube-detector pair. However, one of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2001-04, Vol.28 (4), p.469-474
Main Authors: Endo, Masahiro, Tsunoo, Takanori, Nakamori, Nobuyuki, Yoshida, Katsuya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cone beam CT has a capability for the 3-dimensional imaging of large volumes with isotropic resolution, and has a potentiality for 4-dimensional imaging (dynamic volume imaging), because cone beam CT acquires data of a large volume with one rotation of an x-ray tube-detector pair. However, one of the potential drawbacks of cone beam CT is a larger amount of scattered x-rays, which may enhance the noise in reconstructed images, and thus affect the low-contrast detectablity. Our aim in this work was to estimate the scatter fractions and effects of scatter on image noise, and to seek methods of improving image quality in cone beam CT. First we derived a relationship between the noise in a reconstructed image and in an x-ray intensity measurement. Then we estimated the scatter to primary ratios in x-ray measurements using a Monte-Carlo simulation. From these we estimated the image noise under relevant clinical conditions. The results showed that the scattered radiation made a substantial contribution to the image noise. However, focused collimators could improve it by decreasing the scattered radiation drastically while keeping the primary radiation at nearly the same level. A conventional grid also improved the image noise, though the improvement was less than that of focused collimators.
ISSN:0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI:10.1118/1.1357457