Global Research Alliance N2O chamber methodology guidelines: Flux calculations

A critical step in determining soil‐to‐atmosphere nitrous oxide (N2O) exchange using non‐steady‐state chambers is converting collected gas concentration versus time data to flux values using a flux calculation (FC) scheme. It is well documented that different FC schemes can produce different flux es...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental quality 2020-09, Vol.49 (5), p.1141-1155
Main Authors: Venterea, Rodney T., Petersen, Søren O., Klein, Cecile A. M., Pedersen, Asger R., Noble, Alasdair D. L., Rees, Robert M., Gamble, Joshua D., Parkin, Timothy B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A critical step in determining soil‐to‐atmosphere nitrous oxide (N2O) exchange using non‐steady‐state chambers is converting collected gas concentration versus time data to flux values using a flux calculation (FC) scheme. It is well documented that different FC schemes can produce different flux estimates for a given set of data. Available schemes differ in their theoretical basis, computational requirements, and performance in terms of both accuracy and precision. Nonlinear schemes tend to increase accuracy compared with linear regression but can also decrease precision. The chamber bias correction method can be used if soil physical data are available, but this introduces additional sources of error. Here, the essential theoretical and practical aspects of the most commonly used FC schemes are described as a basis for their selection and use. A gold standard approach for application and selection of FC schemes is presented, as well as alternative approaches based on availability of soil physical property data and intensity of sample collection during each chamber deployment. Additional criteria for scheme selection are provided in the form of an error analysis tool that quantifies performance with respect to both accuracy and precision based on chamber dimensions and sampling duration, soil properties, and analytical measurement precision. Example error analyses are presented for hypothetical conditions illustrating how such analysis can be used to guide FC scheme selection, estimate bias, and inform design of chambers and sampling regimes.
ISSN:0047-2425
1537-2537
DOI:10.1002/jeq2.20118