Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility

Many scientists communicate with the public about risks associated with scientific issues, but such communication may have unintended consequences for how the public views the political orientations and the credibility of the communicating scientist. We explore this possibility using an experiment w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Royal Society open science 2018-02, Vol.5 (2), p.170505-170505
Main Authors: Vraga, Emily, Myers, Teresa, Kotcher, John, Beall, Lindsey, Maibach, Ed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Motivated Reasoning
Perceptions Of Scientists
Political Ideology
Psychology And Cognitive Neuroscience
Risk Communication
Science Communication
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many scientists communicate with the public about risks associated with scientific issues, but such communication may have unintended consequences for how the public views the political orientations and the credibility of the communicating scientist. We explore this possibility using an experiment with a nationally representative sample of Americans in the fall of 2015. We find that risk communication on controversial scientific issues sometimes influences perceptions of the political orientations and credibility of the communicating scientist when the scientist addresses the risks of issues associated with conservative or liberal groups. This relationship is moderated by participant political ideology, with liberals adjusting their perceptions of the scientists' political beliefs more substantially when the scientist addressed the risks of marijuana use when compared with other issues. Conservatives' political perceptions were less impacted by the issue context of the scientific risk communication but indirectly influenced credibility perceptions. Our results support a contextual model of audience interpretation of scientific risk communication. Scientists should be cognizant that audience members may make inferences about the communicating scientist's political orientations and credibility when they engage in risk communication efforts about controversial issues.
ISSN:2054-5703
2054-5703
DOI:10.1098/rsos.170505