Loading…

Long-term outcomes of patients with COVID-19 treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation or usual respiratory support: follow-up study of the Helmet-COVID randomized clinical trial

Purpose To evaluate whether helmet noninvasive ventilation compared to usual respiratory support reduces 180-day mortality and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods This is a pre-planned follow-up study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Intensive care medicine 2023-03, Vol.49 (3), p.302-312
Main Authors: Arabi, Yaseen M., Al-Dorzi, Hasan M., Aldekhyl, Sara, Al Qahtani, Saad, Abdukahil, Sheryl Ann, Al Qasim, Eman, Al Harbi, Mohammad Khulaif, Kharaba, Ayman, Albrahim, Talal, Alshahrani, Mohammed S., Al-Fares, Abdulrahman A., Al Bshabshe, Ali, Mady, Ahmed, Al Duhailib, Zainab, Algethamy, Haifa, Jose, Jesna, Al Mutairi, Mohammed, Al Zumai, Omar, Al Haji, Hussain, Alaqeily, Ahmed, Al Wehaibi, Wedyan, Al Aseri, Zohair, Al-Omari, Awad, Tlayjeh, Haytham, Al-Dawood, Abdulaziz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To evaluate whether helmet noninvasive ventilation compared to usual respiratory support reduces 180-day mortality and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods This is a pre-planned follow-up study of the Helmet-COVID trial. In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure ( n  = 320) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were randomized to receive helmet noninvasive ventilation or usual respiratory support. The modified intention-to-treat population consisted of all enrolled patients except three who were lost at follow-up. The study outcomes were 180-day mortality, EuroQoL (EQ)-5D-5L index values, and EQ-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, non-survivors were assigned a value of 0 for EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS. Results Within 180 days, 63/159 patients (39.6%) died in the helmet noninvasive ventilation group compared to 65/158 patients (41.1%) in the usual respiratory support group (risk difference − 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] − 12.3, 9.3, p  = 0.78). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, patients in the helmet noninvasive ventilation and the usual respiratory support groups did not differ in EQ-5D-5L index values (median 0.68 [IQR 0.00, 1.00], compared to 0.67 [IQR 0.00, 1.00], median difference 0.00 [95% CI − 0.32, 0.32; p  = 0.91]) or EQ-VAS scores (median 70 [IQR 0, 93], compared to 70 [IQR 0, 90], median difference 0.00 (95% CI − 31.92, 31.92; p  = 0.55). Conclusions Helmet noninvasive ventilation did not reduce 180-day mortality or improve HRQoL compared to usual respiratory support among patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia.
ISSN:0342-4642
1432-1238
DOI:10.1007/s00134-023-06981-5