Loading…
Robotic colectomy with CME versus laparoscopic colon resection with or without CME for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare the robotic complete mesocolon excision (RCME) to laparoscopic colectomy (LC) with (LCME) or without CME (LC non-CME) in postoperative outcomes, harvested lymph nodes and disease-free survival. We performed a systematic review with meta-anal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2023-02, Vol.105 (2), p.113-125 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare the robotic complete mesocolon excision (RCME) to laparoscopic colectomy (LC) with (LCME) or without CME (LC non-CME) in postoperative outcomes, harvested lymph nodes and disease-free survival.
We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines.
The literature search yielded seven comparative studies including 677 patients: 269 patients in the RCME group and 408 in the LC group. The pooled analysis concluded to a lower conversion rate in the RCME group (OR=0.17; 95% CI [0.04, 0.74],
=0.02). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of morbidity (OR=1.03; 95% CI [0.70, 1.53],
=0.87), anastomosis leakage (OR=0.83; 95% CI [0.18, 3.72],
=0.81), bleeding (OR=1.90; 95% CI [0.64, 5.58],
=0.25), wound infection (OR=1.37; 95% CI [0.51, 3.68],
=0.53), operative time (mean difference (MD)=36.32; 95% CI [-24.30, 96.93],
=0.24), hospital stay (MD=-0.94; 95% CI [-2.03, 0.15],
=0.09) and disease-free survival (OR=1.29; 95% CI [0.71, 2.35],
=0.41). In the subgroup analysis, the operative time was significantly shorter in the LCME group than RCME group (MD=50.93; 95% CI [40.05, 61.81], |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0035-8843 1478-7083 |
DOI: | 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0051 |