Loading…

External validation of prognostic models predicting outcome after chronic subdural hematoma

Background Several prognostic models for outcomes after chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) treatment have been published in recent years. However, these models are not sufficiently validated for use in daily clinical practice. We aimed to assess the performance of existing prediction models for outcom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta neurochirurgica 2022-10, Vol.164 (10), p.2719-2730
Main Authors: Holl, Dana C., Mikolic, Ana, Blaauw, Jurre, Lodewijkx, Roger, Foppen, Merijn, Jellema, Korné, van der Gaag, Niels A., den Hertog, Heleen M., Jacobs, Bram, van der Naalt, Joukje, Verbaan, Dagmar, Kho, K. H., Dirven, C. M. F., Dammers, Ruben, Lingsma, Hester F., van Klaveren, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Several prognostic models for outcomes after chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) treatment have been published in recent years. However, these models are not sufficiently validated for use in daily clinical practice. We aimed to assess the performance of existing prediction models for outcomes in patients diagnosed with CSDH. Methods We systematically searched relevant literature databases up to February 2021 to identify prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients diagnosed with CSDH. For the external validation of prognostic models, we used a retrospective database, containing data of 2384 patients from three Dutch regions. Prognostic models were included if they predicted either mortality, hematoma recurrence, functional outcome, or quality of life. Models were excluded when predictors were absent in our database or available for 
ISSN:0942-0940
0001-6268
0942-0940
DOI:10.1007/s00701-022-05216-8