Differential diagnosis checklists reduce diagnostic error differentially: A randomised experiment

Introduction Wrong and missed diagnoses contribute substantially to medical error. Can a prompt to generate alternative diagnoses (prompt) or a differential diagnosis checklist (DDXC) increase diagnostic accuracy? How do these interventions affect the diagnostic process and self‐monitoring? Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical education 2021-10, Vol.55 (10), p.1172-1182
Main Authors: Kämmer, Juliane E., Schauber, Stefan K., Hautz, Stefanie C., Stroben, Fabian, Hautz, Wolf E.
Format: Article
Language:eng ; nor
Subjects:
Accuracy
Checklist
Clinical Reasoning
Diagnosis, Differential
Diagnostic Errors
Humans
Medical diagnosis
Medical education
Medical students
Students, Medical
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Wrong and missed diagnoses contribute substantially to medical error. Can a prompt to generate alternative diagnoses (prompt) or a differential diagnosis checklist (DDXC) increase diagnostic accuracy? How do these interventions affect the diagnostic process and self‐monitoring? Methods Advanced medical students (N = 90) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions to complete six computer‐based patient cases: group 1 (prompt) was instructed to write down all diagnoses they considered while acquiring diagnostic test results and to finally rank them. Groups 2 and 3 received the same instruction plus a list of 17 differential diagnoses for the chief complaint of the patient. For half of the cases, the DDXC contained the correct diagnosis (DDXC+), and for the other half, it did not (DDXC−; counterbalanced). Group 4 (control) was only instructed to indicate their final diagnosis. Mixed‐effects models were used to analyse results. Results Students using a DDXC that contained the correct diagnosis had better diagnostic accuracy, mean (standard deviation), 0.75 (0.44), compared to controls without a checklist, 0.49 (0.50), P 
ISSN:0308-0110
1365-2923
DOI:10.1111/medu.14596