Loading…
IVF for unexplained subfertility; whom should we treat?
Which couples with unexplained subfertility can expect increased chances of ongoing pregnancy with IVF compared to expectant management? For couples in which the woman is under 40 years of age, IVF is associated with higher chances of conception than expectant management. The clinical indications fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 2019-07, Vol.34 (7), p.1249-1259 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Which couples with unexplained subfertility can expect increased chances of ongoing pregnancy with IVF compared to expectant management?
For couples in which the woman is under 40 years of age, IVF is associated with higher chances of conception than expectant management.
The clinical indications for IVF have expanded over time from bilateral tubal blockage to include unexplained subfertility in which there is no identifiable barrier to conception. Yet, there is little evidence from randomized controlled trials that IVF is effective in these couples.
We compared outcomes in British couples with unexplained subfertility undergoing IVF (n = 40 921) from registry data to couples with the same type of subfertility on expectant management. Those couples on expectant management (defined as no intervention aside from the advice to have intercourse) comprised a prospective nation-wide Dutch cohort (n = 4875) and a retrospective regional cohort from Aberdeen, Scotland (n = 975). We excluded couples who had tried for |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humrep/dez072 |