Loading…
Monitoring of RAS mutant clones in plasma of patients with RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer
Purpose Some patients with histologically confirmed primary mCRC and mutated RAS reported undetectable RAS mutant clones in plasma after receiving anti-VEGF treatment. The aim was to prospectively assess it with its potential therapeutic implications. Methods RAS mutant genes in solid biopsy (before...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical & translational oncology 2022-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1209-1214 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
Some patients with histologically confirmed primary mCRC and mutated
RAS
reported undetectable
RAS
mutant clones in plasma after receiving anti-VEGF treatment. The aim was to prospectively assess it with its potential therapeutic implications.
Methods
RAS
mutant genes in solid biopsy (before first-line treatment: FOLFOX/CAPOX + bevacizumab) were compared in liquid biopsy (before second-line treatment: panitumumab + FOLFIRI), using Idylla™ system. Discordant results between solid/liquid biopsies were assessed by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) test (solid/liquid biopsies).
Results
Twenty-three patients were assessed (seven had
RAS
mutant discrepancies between solid/liquid biopsies). The NGS test confirmed that 3/23 (13%) patients had undetectable
RAS
mutant clones in liquid biopsy and 3/23 (13%) presented discrepancies in solid biopsy (Idylla™ system vs. NGS test).
Conclusion
Thirteen percentage of patients had undetectable
RAS
mutant clones in liquid biopsy after first-line treatment. However, some discrepancies between solid and liquid biopsies have been observed. These results suggest a need to improve accuracy of
RAS
analyses, especially in solid biopsies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1699-3055 1699-048X 1699-3055 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12094-021-02767-7 |