Telemedicine Improves Access to Care for Spine Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives The objective of this study is to compare the likelihood of missing a scheduled telemedicine and in-person appointments for spine patients. The secondary objective is to assess the impact of socioeconomic status on missed telemedicine and in-person...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global spine journal 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.49-55
Main Authors: Ye, Ivan B., Thomson, Alexandra E., Chowdhury, Navid, Oster, Brittany, Miseo, Vincent S., Jauregui, Julio J., Cavanaugh, Daniel, Koh, Eugene, Gelb, Daniel, Ludwig, Steven
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
GSJ- Original Research
Health care access
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomic status
Telemedicine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives The objective of this study is to compare the likelihood of missing a scheduled telemedicine and in-person appointments for spine patients. The secondary objective is to assess the impact of socioeconomic status on missed telemedicine and in-person appointments. Methods Patients with scheduled outpatient appointments with orthopedic spine faculty between 2019 and 2021 were divided by appointment type: telemedicine (N = 4,387) and in-person (N = 3810). Socioeconomic status was assessed using Area Deprivation Index (ADI) stratified based on percentile: low (75) levels of socioeconomic disadvantage. The primary outcome measure was missed clinic appointments, which was defined as having at least one appointment that was cancelled or labeled “no show.” Results Patients with in-person appointments missed appointments more often than patients with telemedicine visits (51.3% vs 24.7%, P < .001). Patients with high ADI missed their in-person appointments more often than patients with medium and low ADI (59.5% vs 52.2% and 47.5%, P < .001). There was no difference in missed telemedicine visits between patients with high, medium, and low ADI (27.6% vs 24.8% vs 23.8%, P = .294). Patients that missed an appointment were 41.9% more likely to be high ADI (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.20–1.68, P < .001) and 13.4% more likely to be medium ADI (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03–1.26, P = .015) compared with low ADI patients. Conclusions Telemedicine may serve a role in reducing disparity in appointment attendance. While further studies are needed to validate these findings, spine surgeons should consider offering telemedicine as an option to patients.
ISSN:2192-5682
2192-5690
DOI:10.1177/21925682221092398