Opioid Use Stigma: An Examination of Student Attitudes on Harm Reduction Strategies

Understanding how the public views harm reduction strategies may help inform researchers on how to reduce related stigma and barriers to help-seeking. The current study explored whether stigma towards those who use opioids was affected by gender and type of harm reduction strategy used. Undergraduat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of mental health and addiction 2022-12, Vol.20 (6), p.3381-3397
Main Authors: Reynolds, Gemma, Lindsay, Brittany L., Knaak, Stephanie, Szeto, Andrew C. H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Addictions
Community and Environmental Psychology
Drug overdose
Drug use
Females
Gender
Harm reduction
Health Psychology
Heroin
Homeless people
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental disorders
Narcotics
Original
Original Article
Perceptions
Psychiatry
Psychology
Public Health
Rehabilitation
Stereotypes
Stigma
Substance abuse treatment
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Understanding how the public views harm reduction strategies may help inform researchers on how to reduce related stigma and barriers to help-seeking. The current study explored whether stigma towards those who use opioids was affected by gender and type of harm reduction strategy used. Undergraduate students ( N  = 328) were randomly assigned to read one of six vignettes varying by gender and the type of harm reduction strategy: no harm reduction, opioid agonist therapy (OAT), or safe consumption sites (SCSs). Results demonstrated that participants were less stigmatizing towards the character who engaged in OAT compared to the character with no harm reduction. There was also a pattern demonstrating that SCSs may be perceived more negatively than OAT, although these differences only met conventional significance, not adjusted/corrected alphas. There were no significant effects for gender. Qualitative results revealed that participants held misconceptions about harm reduction. Implications and future directions are discussed.
ISSN:1557-1874
1557-1882
DOI:10.1007/s11469-022-00756-7