Use of Molecular Methods To Detect Shigella and Infer Phenotypic Resistance in a Shigella Treatment Study

Molecular diagnostic methods improve the detection of , yet their ability to detect drug resistance on direct stool specimens is less clear. We tested 673 stool specimens from a treatment study in Bangladesh, including 154 culture-positive stool specimens and their paired isolates. We utilized a Taq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2022-01, Vol.60 (1), p.e0177421
Main Authors: Pholwat, Suporn, Liu, Jie, Taniuchi, Mami, Haque, Rashidul, Alam, Mohammed Masud, Faruque, Abu Syed Golam, Ferdous, Tahsin, Ara, Rifat, Platts-Mills, James A, Houpt, Eric R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Bacteriology
Drug Resistance, Bacterial - genetics
Dysentery, Bacillary - diagnosis
Dysentery, Bacillary - drug therapy
Feces
Humans
Macrolides - pharmacology
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Shigella - genetics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Molecular diagnostic methods improve the detection of , yet their ability to detect drug resistance on direct stool specimens is less clear. We tested 673 stool specimens from a treatment study in Bangladesh, including 154 culture-positive stool specimens and their paired isolates. We utilized a TaqMan array card that included quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for 24 enteropathogens and 36 antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. was detected by culture in 23% of stool specimens (154/673), while qPCR detected at diarrhea-associated quantities in 49% (329/673; < 0.05). qPCR for AMR genes on the isolates yielded >94% sensitivity and specificity compared with the phenotypic susceptibility results for azithromycin and ampicillin. The performance for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole susceptibility was less robust, and the assessment of ciprofloxacin was limited because most isolates were resistant. The detection of AMR genes in direct stool specimens generally yielded low specificities for predicting the resistance of the paired isolate, whereas the sensitivity and negative predictive values for predicting susceptibility were often higher. For example, the detection of or in stool yielded a specificity of 56% but a sensitivity of 91% and a negative predictive value of 91% versus the paired isolate's azithromycin resistance result. Patients who received azithromycin prior to presentation were universally culture negative (0/112); however, qPCR still detected at diarrhea-associated quantities in 34/112 (30%). In sum, molecular diagnostics on direct stool specimens greatly increase the diagnostic yield for , including in the setting of prior antibiotics. The molecular detection of drug resistance genes in direct stool specimens had low specificity for confirming resistance but could potentially "rule out" macrolide resistance.
ISSN:0095-1137
1098-660X
1098-660X
DOI:10.1128/JCM.01774-21