Loading…

Integrating genomics and multivariate evolutionary quantitative genetics: a case study of constraints on sexual selection in Drosophila serrata

In evolutionary quantitative genetics, the genetic variance-covariance matrix, , and the vector of directional selection gradients, , are key parameters for predicting multivariate selection responses and genetic constraints. Historically, investigations of and have not overlapped with those dissect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2021-10, Vol.288 (1960), p.20211785-20211785
Main Authors: Reddiex, Adam J, Chenoweth, Stephen F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In evolutionary quantitative genetics, the genetic variance-covariance matrix, , and the vector of directional selection gradients, , are key parameters for predicting multivariate selection responses and genetic constraints. Historically, investigations of and have not overlapped with those dissecting the genetic basis of quantitative traits. Thus, it remains unknown whether these parameters reflect pleiotropic effects at individual loci. Here, we integrate multivariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) with and estimation in a well-studied system of multivariate constraint: sexual selection on male cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in . In a panel of wild-derived re-sequenced lines, we augment genome-based restricted maximum likelihood to estimate alongside multivariate single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects, detecting 532 significant associations from 1 652 276 SNPs. Constraint was evident, with lying in a direction of with low evolvability. Interestingly, minor frequency alleles typically increased male CHC-attractiveness suggesting opposing natural selection on . SNP effects were significantly misaligned with the major eigenvector of , , but well aligned to the second and third eigenvectors and . We discuss potential factors leading to these varied results including multivariate stabilizing selection and mutational bias. Our framework may be useful as researchers increasingly access genomic methods to study multivariate selection responses in wild populations.
ISSN:0962-8452
1471-2954
DOI:10.1098/rspb.2021.1785