Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: Medium-Term Outcomes

Background Although the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has good short-term results, it comes with a significant number of patients requiring revisional surgery because of insufficient weight loss or functional complications. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the single anastomosis duodenoileal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity surgery 2021-11, Vol.31 (11), p.4708-4716
Main Authors: Dijkhorst, Phillip J., Al Nawas, May, Heusschen, Laura, Hazebroek, Eric J., Swank, Dingeman J., Wiezer, René M.J., Aarts, Edo O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cross-Sectional Studies
Gastrectomy
Gastric Bypass
Gastrointestinal surgery
Humans
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Obesity
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Original Contributions
Quality of Life
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Surgical techniques
Weight control
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Although the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has good short-term results, it comes with a significant number of patients requiring revisional surgery because of insufficient weight loss or functional complications. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass (SADI-S) versus the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on health outcomes in (morbidly) obese patients who had previously undergone SG, with up to 5 years of follow-up. Methods Data from patients who underwent revisional SADI-S or RYGB after SG were retrospectively compared on indication of surgery, weight loss, quality of life, micronutrient deficiencies, and complications. Results From 2007 to 2017, 141 patients received revisional laparoscopic surgery after SG in three specialized Dutch bariatric hospitals (SADI-S n =63, RYGB n =78). Percentage total weight loss following revisional surgery at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 22%, 24%, 22%, 18%, and 15% for SADI-S and 10%, 9%, 7%, 8%, and 2% for RYGB ( P
ISSN:0960-8923
1708-0428
DOI:10.1007/s11695-021-05609-1