Loading…
Use of the point of origin code from a universal billing form, UB-04, to efficiently identify hospitalized patients admitted from other health care facilities
Background Recent exposure to health care facilities is a risk factor for carriage of multidrug-resistant organisms, but identification of hospitalized patients admitted from other health care facilities is often inefficient. Methods At an acute care hospital, we utilized a standard point of origin...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of infection control 2012-09, Vol.40 (7), p.659-662 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background Recent exposure to health care facilities is a risk factor for carriage of multidrug-resistant organisms, but identification of hospitalized patients admitted from other health care facilities is often inefficient. Methods At an acute care hospital, we utilized a standard point of origin code from a universal billing form (UB-04) to categorize hospitalized patients as admitted from any health care facility (long-term care facility vs acute care facility). In a prospective study, the point of origin code and information obtained from physician-documented history were validated against patient self-report. Results Admission source for 523 patients was assessed. For identifying admission from any health care facility, the point of origin code had 86% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77-92) and 98% specificity (95% CI: 97-99). Physician-documented history had 75% sensitivity (95% CI: 65-84) and 98% specificity (95% CI: 96-99). For identifying patients from long-term care facilities, the sensitivities of the point of origin code and physician history were 50% (95% CI: 23-77) and 71% (95% CI: 42-92), respectively. For identifying patients admitted from acute care facilities, the sensitivities of the point of origin code and physician history were 93% (95% CI: 84-98) and 76% (95% CI: 64-85), respectively. Conclusion The point of origin code is an accurate method of identifying patients admitted from another health care facility that is comparable with physician-documented history. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-6553 1527-3296 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.08.013 |