The Rapid Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccination in Emergency Departments for Underserved Patients Study

Emergency departments (EDs) often serve vulnerable populations who may lack primary care and have suffered disproportionate COVID-19 pandemic effects. Comparing patients having and lacking a regular source of medical care and other ED patient characteristics, we assessed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of emergency medicine 2021-10, Vol.78 (4), p.502-510
Main Authors: Rodriguez, Robert M., Torres, Jesus R., Chang, Anna Marie, Haggins, Adrianne N., Eucker, Stephanie A., O’Laughlin, Kelli N., Anderson, Erik, Miller, Daniel G., Wilkerson, R. Gentry, Caldwell, Martina, Lim, Stephen C., Raja, Ali S., Baumann, Brigitte M., Graterol, Joseph, Eswaran, Vidya, Chinnock, Brian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
COVID-19
COVID-19 - prevention & control
COVID-19 Vaccines
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Infectious Disease/Original Research
Male
masks
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Vaccination - statistics & numerical data
Vaccination Refusal - statistics & numerical data
vaccine hesitancy
Vulnerable Populations
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Emergency departments (EDs) often serve vulnerable populations who may lack primary care and have suffered disproportionate COVID-19 pandemic effects. Comparing patients having and lacking a regular source of medical care and other ED patient characteristics, we assessed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reasons for not wanting the vaccine, perceived access to vaccine sites and willingness to get the vaccine as part of ED care. Cross sectional survey conducted from 12/10/2020 to 3/7/21 at 15 safety net United States EDs. Primary outcomes were COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reasons for vaccine hesitancy, and sites (including EDs) for potential COVID-19 vaccine receipt. Of 2575 patients approached, 2301 (89.4%) participated. Of the 18.4% of respondents who lacked a regular source of medical care, 65% used the ED as their usual source of healthcare. The overall rate of vaccine hesitancy was 39%; the range among the 15 sites was 28 to 58%. Respondents who lacked a regular source of medical care were more commonly vaccine hesitant than those who had a regular source of medical care (47 vs 38%, 9% difference, 95% CI 4 – 14%). Other characteristics associated with greater vaccine hesitancy were younger age, female gender, African American race, Latinx ethnicity, and not having received an influenza vaccine in the past five years. Of the 61% COVID-19 vaccine acceptors, 21% stated that they lacked a primary doctor or clinic to receive it; the vast majority (95%) of these respondents would accept the COVID-19 vaccine as part of their care in the ED. ED patients who lack a regular source of medical care are particularly hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination. Most COVID-19 vaccine acceptors would accept it as part of their care in the ED. EDs may have pivotal roles in COVID-19 vaccine messaging and delivery to highly vulnerable populations.
ISSN:0196-0644
1097-6760
DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.026