Phylogeography, Population Structure, and Species Delimitation in Rockhopper Penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome and Eudyptes moseleyi)

Rockhopper penguins are delimited as 2 species, the northern rockhopper (Eudyptes moseleyi) and the southern rockhopper (Eudyptes chrysocome), with the latter comprising 2 subspecies, the western rockhopper (Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome) and the eastern rockhopper (Eudyptes chrysocome filholi). We...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of heredity 2019-12, Vol.110 (7), p.801-817
Main Authors: Mays, Herman L, Oehler, David A, Morrison, Kyle W, Morales, Ariadna E, Lycans, Alyssa, Perdue, Justin, Battley, Phil F, Cherel, Yves, Chilvers, B Louise, Crofts, Sarah, Demongin, Laurent, Fry, W Roger, Hiscock, Jo, Kusch, Alejandro, Marin, Manuel, Poisbleau, Maud, Quillfeldt, Petra, Raya Rey, Andrea, Steinfurth, Antje, Thompson, David R, Weakley, Leonard A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Environmental Sciences
Genetics, Population
Original
Phylogeny
Phylogeography
Population Density
Spheniscidae - classification
Spheniscidae - genetics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rockhopper penguins are delimited as 2 species, the northern rockhopper (Eudyptes moseleyi) and the southern rockhopper (Eudyptes chrysocome), with the latter comprising 2 subspecies, the western rockhopper (Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome) and the eastern rockhopper (Eudyptes chrysocome filholi). We conducted a phylogeographic study using multilocus data from 114 individuals sampled across 12 colonies from the entire range of the northern/southern rockhopper complex to assess potential population structure, gene flow, and species limits. Bayesian and likelihood methods with nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, including model testing and heuristic approaches, support E. moseleyi and E. chrysocome as distinct species lineages with a divergence time of 0.97 Ma. However, these analyses also indicated the presence of gene flow between these species. Among southern rockhopper subspecies, we found evidence of significant gene flow and heuristic approaches to species delimitation based on the genealogical diversity index failed to delimit them as species. The best-supported population models for the southern rockhoppers were those where E. c. chrysocome and E. c. filholi were combined into a single lineage or 2 lineages with bidirectional gene flow. Additionally, we found that E. c. filholi has the highest effective population size while E. c. chrysocome showed similar effective population size to that of the endangered E. moseleyi. We suggest that the current taxonomic definitions within rockhopper penguins be upheld and that E. chrysocome populations, all found south of the subtropical front, should be treated as a single taxon with distinct management units for E. c. chrysocome and E. c. filholi.
ISSN:0022-1503
1465-7333
1471-8505
DOI:10.1093/jhered/esz051