Loading…

Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer using transfer learning from general-purpose deep-learning networks

Two deep-learning algorithms designed to classify images according to the Gleason grading system that used transfer learning from two well-known general-purpose image classification networks (AlexNet and GoogleNet) were trained on Hematoxylin–Eosin histopathology stained microscopy images with prost...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Romanian journal of morphology and embryology 2020-01, Vol.61 (1), p.149-155
Main Authors: Şerbănescu, Mircea-Sebastian, Manea, Nicolae Cătălin, Streba, Liliana, Belciug, Smaranda, Pleşea, Iancu Emil, Pirici, Ionica, Bungărdean, Raluca Maria, Pleşea, Răzvan Mihail
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two deep-learning algorithms designed to classify images according to the Gleason grading system that used transfer learning from two well-known general-purpose image classification networks (AlexNet and GoogleNet) were trained on Hematoxylin–Eosin histopathology stained microscopy images with prostate cancer. The dataset consisted of 439 images asymmetrically distributed in four Gleason grading groups. Mean and standard deviation accuracy for AlexNet derivate network was of 61.17±7 and for GoogleNet derivate network was of 60.9±7.4. The similar results obtained by the two networks with very different architecture, together with the normal distribution of classification error for both algorithms show that we have reached a maximum classification rate on this dataset. Taking into consideration all the constraints, we conclude that the resulted networks could assist pathologists in this field, providing first or second opinions on Gleason grading, thus presenting an objective opinion in a grading system which has showed in time a great deal of interobserver variability.
ISSN:1220-0522
2066-8279
DOI:10.47162/RJME.61.1.17