Handling misclassified stratification variables in the analysis of randomised trials with continuous outcomes

Many trials use stratified randomisation, where participants are randomised within strata defined by one or more baseline covariates. While it is important to adjust for stratification variables in the analysis, the appropriate method of adjustment is unclear when stratification variables are affect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Statistics in medicine 2023-08, Vol.42 (19), p.3529-3546
Main Authors: Yelland, Lisa N., Louise, Jennie, Kahan, Brennan C., Morris, Tim P., Lee, Katherine J., Sullivan, Thomas R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Computer Simulation
covariate misclassification
covariate‐adaptive randomisation
Humans
Linear Models
Random Allocation
randomisation error
Research Design
stratification error
stratified randomisation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many trials use stratified randomisation, where participants are randomised within strata defined by one or more baseline covariates. While it is important to adjust for stratification variables in the analysis, the appropriate method of adjustment is unclear when stratification variables are affected by misclassification and hence some participants are randomised in the incorrect stratum. We conducted a simulation study to compare methods of adjusting for stratification variables affected by misclassification in the analysis of continuous outcomes when all or only some stratification errors are discovered, and when the treatment effect or treatment‐by‐covariate interaction effect is of interest. The data were analysed using linear regression with no adjustment, adjustment for the strata used to perform the randomisation (randomisation strata), adjustment for the strata if all errors are corrected (true strata), and adjustment for the strata after some errors are discovered and corrected (updated strata). The unadjusted model performed poorly in all settings. Adjusting for the true strata was optimal, while the relative performance of adjusting for the randomisation strata or the updated strata varied depending on the setting. As the true strata are unlikely to be known with certainty in practice, we recommend using the updated strata for adjustment and performing subgroup analyses, provided the discovery of errors is unlikely to depend on treatment group, as expected in blinded trials. Greater transparency is needed in the reporting of stratification errors and how they were addressed in the analysis.
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/sim.9818