Improving Family Navigation for Children With Autism: A Comparison of Two Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials

Family navigation (FN), a care management strategy, helps families overcome systems and person-level barriers to care. We previously demonstrated FN's feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy for increasing access and reducing time to autism-related diagnostic services among low-incom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Academic pediatrics 2021-03, Vol.21 (2), p.265-271
Main Authors: Feinberg, Emily, Kuhn, Jocelyn, Eilenberg, Jenna Sandler, Levinson, Julia, Patts, Gregory, Cabral, Howard, Broder-Fingert, Sarabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
autism
Autistic Disorder - diagnosis
Autistic Disorder - therapy
family navigation
Humans
Minority Groups
Pilot Projects
pilot study
Poverty
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
research methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Family navigation (FN), a care management strategy, helps families overcome systems and person-level barriers to care. We previously demonstrated FN's feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy for increasing access and reducing time to autism-related diagnostic services among low-income, minority children. In this paper, we describe modifications to FN in response to concerns raised in our first pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), and then assess these modifications in a second pilot RCT. An advisory group recommended modifications to recruitment procedures and study conditions. Forty parent-child dyad participants with autism-related concerns were randomized to receive modified usual care (UC) or modified FN. We compared whether the first and second pilot RCTs differed in: participant enrollment, satisfaction with clinical care, and timely completion of the diagnostic assessment. Recruitment improved under the modified protocol with significantly fewer potentially eligible families refusing (19.5% vs 4.8%, P < .05) or being excluded from study enrollment (43.6% vs 0%, P < .01). Comparing the first and second pilot RCTs, regardless of study arm, families in the second pilot were more likely to complete diagnostic assessment (UC: hazard ratio [HR] 3.41, 95% confidence intervals [CI 1.20, 9.68]; FN: HR 2.64, 95% CI [1.31, 5.30]) and report greater satisfaction with clinical care. In the second pilot, compared to UC, FN continued increase the likelihood of completing the diagnostic assessment (HR: 2.57; 95% CI [1.22, 5.40]). Easy-to-implement system-level enhancements improved study recruitment, satisfaction with care, and completion of a diagnostic assessment. With enhancement, FN continued to confer benefits to families.
ISSN:1876-2859
1876-2867
DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2020.04.007