Olfactory disorders in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a systematic literature review

Recent scientific literature has widely described a possible major role of smell dysfunction as a specific symptom of coronavirus disease 2019. This systematic review may provide a more holistic approach to current knowledge of the disease. A systematic review was completed using Embase, PubMed and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of laryngology and otology 2020-09, Vol.134 (9), p.754-763
Main Authors: Fuccillo, E, Saibene, A M, Canevini, M P, Felisati, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Coronaviridae
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Data collection
Infections
Laboratories
Literature reviews
Olfaction disorders
Patients
Quarantine
Questionnaires
Review
Review Article
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Smell
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recent scientific literature has widely described a possible major role of smell dysfunction as a specific symptom of coronavirus disease 2019. This systematic review may provide a more holistic approach to current knowledge of the disease. A systematic review was completed using Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases that considered original articles focused on olfactory evaluation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients, published between March and May 2020, in English language. From the 483 research papers initially identified, 32 original studies were selected, comprising a total of 17 306 subjects with a laboratory confirmed diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019. Individual study sample sizes ranged from 6 to 6452 patients. This comprehensive analysis confirmed that olfactory disorders represent an important clinical feature in coronavirus disease 2019, with a prevalence of 11-100 per cent in included patients, although there was heterogeneity in terms of assessment tools and population selection criteria. The results indicate that an accurate clinical evaluation should be carried out using structured questionnaires and tests with olfactory substances.
ISSN:0022-2151
1748-5460
DOI:10.1017/S0022215120002005