Age of acquisition impacts the brain differently depending on neuroanatomical metric

Although researchers generally agree that a certain set of brain areas underlie bilingual language processing, there is discrepancy regarding what effect timing of language acquisition has on these regions. We aimed to investigate the neuroanatomical correlates of age of acquisition (AoA), which has...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Human brain mapping 2020-02, Vol.41 (2), p.484-502
Main Authors:	Claussenius‐Kalman, Hannah, Vaughn, Kelly A., Archila‐Suerte, Pilar, Hernandez, Arturo E.
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	age of acquisition Anatomy Bilingualism Brain Brain architecture Cognitive ability Density gray matter Information processing Language Language acquisition language development magnetic resonance imaging Natural language processing Nervous system neuroanatomy replication crisis Substantia grisea Temporal cortex Temporal gyrus Thickness
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Although researchers generally agree that a certain set of brain areas underlie bilingual language processing, there is discrepancy regarding what effect timing of language acquisition has on these regions. We aimed to investigate the neuroanatomical correlates of age of acquisition (AoA), which has been examined previously, but with inconsistent results, likely influenced by methodological differences across studies. We analyzed gray matter density, volume, and thickness using whole‐brain linear models in 334 bilinguals and monolinguals. Neuroanatomical correlates of AoA differed depending on gray matter metric. Relative to early bilinguals, late bilinguals had thicker cortex in language processing and cognitive control regions, and greater density in multiple frontal areas and the right middle temporal and supramarginal gyri. Early bilinguals had greater volume than late bilinguals in the left middle temporal gyrus. Overall, volume was the least sensitive to AoA‐related differences. Multiple regions not classically implicated in dual‐language processing were also found, which highlights the important role of whole‐brain analyses in neuroscience. This is the first study to investigate AoA and gray matter thickness, volume, and density all in the same sample. We conclude that cognitive models of bilingualism should consider the roles of development and neuroanatomical metric in driving our understanding of bilingual and monolingual language organization.
ISSN:	1065-9471 1097-0193