A comparison of three tricuspid annuloplasty techniques: Suture, ring, and band

This study aims to compare three different tricuspid annuloplasty techniques using suture, ring, and band. Between January 2010 and December 2015, a total of 231 consecutive patients (78 males, 153 females; mean age 50.3±15.9 years; range, 34 to 66 years) who underwent tricuspid valve annuloplasty u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Türk göğüs kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi 2019-07, Vol.27 (3), p.286-293
Main Authors: Lafçı, Gökhan, Çiçek, Ömer Faruk, Lafçı, Ayşe, Esenboğa, Kerim, Günertem, Eren, Kadiroğulları, Ersin, Çiçek, Mustafa Cüneyt, Diken, Adem İlkay, Çağlı, Kerim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Original
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aims to compare three different tricuspid annuloplasty techniques using suture, ring, and band. Between January 2010 and December 2015, a total of 231 consecutive patients (78 males, 153 females; mean age 50.3±15.9 years; range, 34 to 66 years) who underwent tricuspid valve annuloplasty using three different techniques were retrospectively analyzed. Tricuspid valve r epair w as p erformed w ith d e Vega a nnuloplasty t echnique (n=62, 26.8%), flexible ring (n=76, 32.9%) or Teflon strip (n=93, 40.3%). Postoperative data including vital signs, echocardiographic reports, functional status, and the rate of re-do surgeries were recorded. Cardiopulmonary bypass times were statistically significantly shorter in the de Vega annuloplasty group (p
ISSN:1301-5680
2149-8156
DOI:10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.17474