Loading…
Combining online and in-person methods to evaluate the content validity of PROMIS fatigue short forms in rheumatoid arthritis
Purpose Fatigue is frequent and often severe and disabling in RA, and there is no consensus on how to measure it. We used online surveys and in-person interviews to evaluate PROMIS Fatigue 7a and 8a short forms (SFs) in people with RA. Methods We recruited people with RA from an online patient commu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quality of life research 2018-09, Vol.27 (9), p.2443-2451 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose Fatigue is frequent and often severe and disabling in RA, and there is no consensus on how to measure it. We used online surveys and in-person interviews to evaluate PROMIS Fatigue 7a and 8a short forms (SFs) in people with RA. Methods We recruited people with RA from an online patient community (n=200) and three academic medical centers (n=84) in the US. Participants completed both SFs then rated the comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of the items to their fatigue experience. Cognitive debriefing of items was conducted in a subset of 32 clinic patients. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and associations were evaluated using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. Results Mean SF scores were similar (p≥.61) among clinic patients reflecting mild fatigue (i.e., 54.5–55.9), but were significantly higher (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11136-018-1880-x |