Loading…

Combining online and in-person methods to evaluate the content validity of PROMIS fatigue short forms in rheumatoid arthritis

Purpose Fatigue is frequent and often severe and disabling in RA, and there is no consensus on how to measure it. We used online surveys and in-person interviews to evaluate PROMIS Fatigue 7a and 8a short forms (SFs) in people with RA. Methods We recruited people with RA from an online patient commu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quality of life research 2018-09, Vol.27 (9), p.2443-2451
Main Authors: Bartlett, S. J., Gutierrez, A. K., Butanis, A., Bykerk, V. P., Curtis, J. R., Ginsberg, S., Leong, A. L., Lyddiatt, A., Nowell, W. B., Orbai, A. M., Smith, K. C., Bingham, C. O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Fatigue is frequent and often severe and disabling in RA, and there is no consensus on how to measure it. We used online surveys and in-person interviews to evaluate PROMIS Fatigue 7a and 8a short forms (SFs) in people with RA. Methods We recruited people with RA from an online patient community (n=200) and three academic medical centers (n=84) in the US. Participants completed both SFs then rated the comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of the items to their fatigue experience. Cognitive debriefing of items was conducted in a subset of 32 clinic patients. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and associations were evaluated using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. Results Mean SF scores were similar (p≥.61) among clinic patients reflecting mild fatigue (i.e., 54.5–55.9), but were significantly higher (p
ISSN:0962-9343
1573-2649
DOI:10.1007/s11136-018-1880-x