Graft-Recipient Anteroposterior Mismatch Does Not Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle

Objectives: For the treatment of femoral condyle cartilage defects, anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimension matching in osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) pairs donor and recipient condyles to minimize articular incongruity. This aims to reduce the potential risk of graft fai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2018-07, Vol.6 (7_suppl4), p.2325967118
Main Authors: Coxe, Francesca R., Wang, Dean, Balazs, George Christian, Chang, Brenda, Jones, Kristofer J., Rodeo, Scott A., Williams, Riley J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cartilage
Clinical outcomes
Defects
Failure
Knee
Orthopedics
Sports medicine
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives: For the treatment of femoral condyle cartilage defects, anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimension matching in osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) pairs donor and recipient condyles to minimize articular incongruity. This aims to reduce the potential risk of graft failure and improve clinical outcomes. However, size matching restricts the number of compatible osteochondral allografts, which has a number of disadvantages including delayed surgical treatment and prolonged graft storage. Some surgeons match donor-to-recipient exclusively using the ML dimension to ensure that an adequately sized dowel can be harvested, while ignoring AP mismatch. Because a large AP mismatch can lead to radius of curvature differences between graft and host and potential articular incongruity after implantation, this study aimed to evaluate the association between AP mismatch and clinical outcomes of OCA. Methods: A retrospective review of patients treated with OCA for femoral condyle cartilage defects from 2000 to 2015 was conducted. A minimum follow-up of 2 years was required for analysis. Graft characteristics, including AP and ML dimensions, were gathered from vendor-specific allograft offering documents. Patient condyle dimensions were measured from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 1). Reoperations and patient responses to validated outcome measures were reviewed. Failure was defined by any partial removal/revision of the allograft or conversion to knee arthroplasty. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association of AP mismatch with OCA failure while adjusting for patient age, sex, number of previous ipsilateral knee surgeries, and number of lesions treated. Results: A total of 69 knees (mean age, 35.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean duration of follow-up was 4 years (range, 2-16 years). The average absolute AP mismatch between graft and patient was 6.7 mm (range, 0-20 mm) (P
ISSN:2325-9671
2325-9671
DOI:10.1177/2325967118S00158