Loading…
Single Versus Double-Bundle PCL Reconstruction: Scientific Rationale and Clinical Evidence
Purpose of Review The goal of this paper is to review the biomechanical and clinical rationale for single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. The primary question is whether there has been demonstrated any clear biomechanical or clinical superiority of a dou...
Saved in:
Published in: | Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine 2018-06, Vol.11 (2), p.285-289 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose of Review
The goal of this paper is to review the biomechanical and clinical rationale for single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. The primary question is whether there has been demonstrated any clear biomechanical or clinical superiority of a double-bundle reconstruction over a single-bundle reconstruction.
Recent Findings
There is some recent evidence demonstrating biomechanical superiority of double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction; however, this is not definitive. Clinical superiority has not been clearly demonstrated as of yet.
Summary
The primary question which served as the basis of this review remains unanswered. There is recent biomechanical data to suggest a potential benefit of double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction, but not all studies are in agreement. Furthermore, the possible biomechanical advantages have not yet been borne out in clinical studies. At this point, we cannot clearly recommend one technique versus another and the decision should be left to the treating surgeon. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1935-973X 1935-9748 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12178-018-9486-z |