Wanted: a better cut-off value for the Epworth Sleepiness Scale

Summary Background Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is the main complaint in many neurological sleep disorders, such as idiopathic hypersomnia, narcolepsy, or obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAS). The validity of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) as a screening tool for EDS remains co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 2018-05, Vol.130 (9-10), p.349-355
Main Authors: Trimmel, Karin, Żebrowska, Magdalena, Böck, Marion, Stefanic, Andrijana, Mayer, Daniel, Klösch, Gerhard, Auff, Eduard, Seidel, Stefan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence - diagnosis
Endocrinology
Female
Gastroenterology
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
Mass Screening - standards
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original
Original Article
Pneumology/Respiratory System
Polysomnography
Sleep
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - diagnosis
Sleepiness
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is the main complaint in many neurological sleep disorders, such as idiopathic hypersomnia, narcolepsy, or obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAS). The validity of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) as a screening tool for EDS remains controversial. We therefore investigated (1) the interrelation of the ESS total score and the mean sleep latency (MSL) during the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) and (2) the diagnostic accuracy of the ESS total score to detect EDS in patients with the chief complaint of subjective EDS. Methods A total of 94 patients (48 males) with subjective EDS were included in this study. Regression analyses and ROC curve analyses were carried out to assess the predictive value of the ESS score for MSL. Results The ESS score significantly predicted a shortened MSL ( p  = 0.01, β = −0.29). After dichotomizing into two groups, the ESS score predicted MSL only in patients with hypersomnia or narcolepsy ( p  = 0.01, β = −0.33), but not in patients with other clinical diagnoses (e. g. OSAS; p  = 0.36, β = −0.15). The ROC curve analyses indicated an optimal ESS cut-off value of 16 with a sensitivity of 70%; however, specificity remained unsatisfactory (55.6%). Conclusions Our results suggest that the predictive value of the ESS score in patients with subjective EDS is low and patient subgroup-specific (superior in hypersomnia/narcolepsy vs. other diagnoses) and that the commonly used cut-off of 11 points may be insufficient for clinical practice.
ISSN:0043-5325
1613-7671
DOI:10.1007/s00508-017-1308-6