Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

ObjectiveTo analyse caesarean section (CS) using Robson 10-group classification system in an Ethiopian university hospital.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingA university hospital in eastern, Ethiopia.Participants980 women who underwent CS from January 2016 to April 2017.Main outcomeRobson groups (1...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	BMJ open 2018-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e020520-e020520
Main Authors:	Tura, Abera Kenay, Pijpers, Olga, de Man, Myrna, Cleveringa, Myrthe, Koopmans, Ingeborg, Gure, Tadesse, Stekelenburg, Jelle
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Adult Births Cesarean Section Childbirth & labor Classification Cross-Sectional Studies Ethiopia Female Fetuses Hospitals, University - statistics & numerical data Humans Infant, Newborn Maternal mortality Obstetrics Obstetrics and Gynaecology Parity Population Pregnancy Public health Womens health Young Adult
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	ObjectiveTo analyse caesarean section (CS) using Robson 10-group classification system in an Ethiopian university hospital.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingA university hospital in eastern, Ethiopia.Participants980 women who underwent CS from January 2016 to April 2017.Main outcomeRobson groups (1–10—based on gestational age, fetal presentation, number of fetus, onset of labour and history of CS) and indications for CS.ResultsRobson group 3 (multiparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy in spontaneous labour with no history of CS), group 5 (multiparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy with history of CS) and group 1 (single cephalic nulliparous women full-term pregnancy in spontaneous labour) were the major contributors to the overall CS at 21.4%, 21.1% and 19.3%, respectively. The three major indications for CS were fetal compromise (mainly fetal distress), obstructed labour (mainly cephalopelvic disproportion) and previous CS.ConclusionRobson groups 3, 5 and 1 were the major contributors to the overall CS rate. Fetal compromise, obstructed labour and previous CS were the underlying indications for performing CS. Further study is required to assess the appropriateness of the indications and to reduce CS among the low-risk groups (groups 1 and 3).
ISSN:	2044-6055 2044-6055