Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload

Background Surgeons in the operating theatre deal constantly with high‐demand tasks that require simultaneous processing of a large amount of information. In certain situations, high cognitive load occurs, which may impact negatively on a surgeon's performance. This systematic review aims to pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of surgery 2018-04, Vol.105 (5), p.491-501
Main Authors: Dias, R. D., Ngo‐Howard, M. C., Boskovski, M. T., Zenati, M. A., Yule, S. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical Competence
Cognition - physiology
Humans
Self Report
Surgeons
Surgeons - psychology
Systematic Review
Workload - psychology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Surgeons in the operating theatre deal constantly with high‐demand tasks that require simultaneous processing of a large amount of information. In certain situations, high cognitive load occurs, which may impact negatively on a surgeon's performance. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the different methods used to assess surgeons' cognitive load, and a critique of the reliability and validity of current assessment metrics. Methods A search strategy encompassing MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, PROSPERO and the Cochrane database was developed to identify peer‐reviewed articles published from inception to November 2016. Quality was assessed by using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). A summary table was created to describe study design, setting, specialty, participants, cognitive load measures and MERSQI score. Results Of 391 articles retrieved, 84 met the inclusion criteria, totalling 2053 unique participants. Most studies were carried out in a simulated setting (59 studies, 70 per cent). Sixty studies (71 per cent) used self‐reporting methods, of which the NASA Task Load Index (NASA‐TLX) was the most commonly applied tool (44 studies, 52 per cent). Heart rate variability analysis was the most used real‐time method (11 studies, 13 per cent). Conclusion Self‐report instruments are valuable when the aim is to assess the overall cognitive load in different surgical procedures and assess learning curves within competence‐based surgical education. When the aim is to assess cognitive load related to specific operative stages, real‐time tools should be used, as they allow capture of cognitive load fluctuation. A combination of both subjective and objective methods might provide optimal measurement of surgeons' cognition. Complex field
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1002/bjs.10795