Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies

ObjectivesTo define a series of clinical trial transparency measures and apply them to large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their 2014 FDA-approved drugs.DesignCross-sectional descriptive analysis of all clinical trials supporting 2014 Food and Drugs Administration (FDA)-approved new...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	BMJ open 2017-12, Vol.7 (12), p.e017917-e017917
Main Authors:	Miller, Jennifer E, Wilenzick, Marc, Ritcey, Nolan, Ross, Joseph S, Mello, Michelle M
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Bioethics Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic - ethics Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence Cross-Sectional Studies Drug Approval - legislation & jurisprudence Drug Industry - ethics Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence Drugs Ethics FDA approval Food Humans Information sharing Innovations Modernization Pharmaceutical industry Public health Registration Research Report - standards United States United States Food and Drug Administration
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	ObjectivesTo define a series of clinical trial transparency measures and apply them to large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their 2014 FDA-approved drugs.DesignCross-sectional descriptive analysis of all clinical trials supporting 2014 Food and Drugs Administration (FDA)-approved new drug applications (NDAs) for novel drugs sponsored by large companies.Data sourcesData from over 45 sources, including Drugs@FDA.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov, corporate and international registries; PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, corporate press releases, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and personal communications with drug manufacturers.Outcome measuresTrial registration, results reporting, clinical study report (CSR) synopsis sharing, biomedical journal publication, and FDA Amendments Acts (FDAAA) compliance, analysed on the drug level.ResultsThe FDA approved 19 novel new drugs, sponsored by 11 large companies, involving 553 trials, in 2014. We analysed 505 relevant trials. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 86%–100%) of trials in patients were registered, 71% (IQR 57%–100%) reported results or shared a CSR synopsis, 80% (70%–100%) were published and 96% (80%–100%) were publicly available in some form by 13 months after FDA approval. Disclosure rates were lower at FDA approval (65%) and improved significantly by 6 months post FDA approval. Per drug, a median of 100% (IQR 75%–100%) of FDAAA-applicable trials were compliant. Half of reviewed drugs had publicly disclosed results for all trials in patients in our sample. One trial was uniquely registered in a corporate registry, and not ClinicalTrials.gov; 0 trials were uniquely registered in international registries.ConclusionsAmong large pharmaceutical companies and new drugs, clinical trial transparency is high based on several standards, although opportunities for improvement remain. Transparency is markedly higher for trials in patients than among all trials supporting drug approval, including trials in healthy volunteers. Ongoing efforts to publicly track companies’ transparency records and recognise exemplary companies may encourage further progress.
ISSN:	2044-6055 2044-6055