Loading…

Intravaginal Practices and Prevalence of Sexual and Reproductive Tract Infections Among Women in Rural Malawi

BACKGROUNDMany women engage in intravaginal practices (IVP) with a goal of improving genital hygiene and increasing sexual pleasure. Intravaginal practices can disrupt the genital mucosa, and some studies have found that IVP increases risk of acquisition of HIV and bacterial vaginosis (BV). Limited...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sexually transmitted diseases 2016-12, Vol.43 (12), p.750-755
Main Authors: Esber, Allahna, Rao, Nisha, Norris, Alison, Reese, Patricia Carr, Kandodo, Jonathan, Nampandeni, Patrick, Jumbe, Enock, Turner, Abigail Norris
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUNDMany women engage in intravaginal practices (IVP) with a goal of improving genital hygiene and increasing sexual pleasure. Intravaginal practices can disrupt the genital mucosa, and some studies have found that IVP increases risk of acquisition of HIV and bacterial vaginosis (BV). Limited prior research also suggests significant associations between IVP, herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), and high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODSWe examined associations between IVP and HPV, BV, and HSV-2 among 200 women in rural Malawi participating in a clinic-based study on sexual and reproductive tract infections. We calculated prevalence ratios for the associations between frequency and type of IVP and outcomes of HPV, BV, and HSV-2. RESULTSIntravaginal practices were commonly performed, with 95% of women reporting current use of at least 1 practice. Infections were also frequently detectedTwenty-two percent of the sample had at least 1 high-risk HPV type, 51% had BV, and 50% were HSV-2 seropositive. We observed no significant associations between type of IVP, frequency of IVP, or a combined measure capturing type and frequency of IVP—and any of the infection outcomes. CONCLUSIONSAlthough both IVP and our outcomes of interest (BV, HPV, and HSV-2) were common in the study population, we did not detect associations between IVP type or frequency and any of the 3 infections. However, the high prevalence and frequency of IVP may have limited our ability to detect significant associations.
ISSN:0148-5717
1537-4521
DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000531