Moral Distress Amongst American Physician Trainees Regarding Futile Treatments at the End of Life: A Qualitative Study

Background Ethical challenges are common in end of life care; the uncertainty of prognosis and the ethically permissible boundaries of treatment create confusion and conflict about the balance between benefits and burdens experienced by patients. Objective We asked physician trainees in internal med...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2016-01, Vol.31 (1), p.93-99
Main Authors:	Dzeng, Elizabeth, Colaianni, Alessandra, Roland, Martin, Levine, David, Kelly, Michael P., Barclay, Stephen, Smith, Thomas J.
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Attitude of Health Personnel Clinical Competence Communication Data processing End of life Ethics Female Health care facilities Humans Internal Medicine Male Medical Futility - psychology Medical personnel Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morals Original Research Patients Physicians - psychology Qualitative analysis Qualitative Research Stress, Psychological - psychology Terminal Care - ethics United States
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Background Ethical challenges are common in end of life care; the uncertainty of prognosis and the ethically permissible boundaries of treatment create confusion and conflict about the balance between benefits and burdens experienced by patients. Objective We asked physician trainees in internal medicine how they reacted and responded to ethical challenges arising in the context of perceived futile treatments at the end of life and how these challenges contribute to moral distress. Design Semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews. Participants Twenty-two internal medicine residents and fellows across three American academic medical centers. Approach This study uses systematic qualitative methods of data gathering, analysis and interpretation. Key Results Physician trainees experienced significant moral distress when they felt obligated to provide treatments at or near the end of life that they believed to be futile. Some trainees developed detached and dehumanizing attitudes towards patients as a coping mechanism, which may contribute to a loss of empathy. Successful coping strategies included formal and informal conversations with colleagues and superiors about the emotional and ethical challenges of providing care at the end of life. Conclusions Moral distress amongst physician trainees may occur when they feel obligated to provide treatments at the end of life that they believe to be futile or harmful.
ISSN:	0884-8734 1525-1497