Loading…

Effect of Variation in hemorheology between human and animal blood on the binding efficacy of vascular-targeted carriers

Animal models are extensively used to evaluate the in vivo functionality of novel drug delivery systems (DDS). However, many variations likely exist in vivo between the animals and human physiological environment that significantly alter results obtained with animal models relative to human system....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2015-06, Vol.5 (1), p.11631-11631, Article 11631
Main Authors: Namdee, K., Carrasco-Teja, M., Fish, M. B., Charoenphol, P., Eniola-Adefeso, O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6980006da91fd7303d712d68a7947d3a281136405a49dda24d453d2be2480a083
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6980006da91fd7303d712d68a7947d3a281136405a49dda24d453d2be2480a083
container_end_page 11631
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11631
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 5
creator Namdee, K.
Carrasco-Teja, M.
Fish, M. B.
Charoenphol, P.
Eniola-Adefeso, O.
description Animal models are extensively used to evaluate the in vivo functionality of novel drug delivery systems (DDS). However, many variations likely exist in vivo between the animals and human physiological environment that significantly alter results obtained with animal models relative to human system. To date, it is not clear if the variation in hemorheology and hemodynamics between common animal and human models affect the functionality of DDS. This study investigates the role of hemorheology of humans and various animal models in dictating the binding efficiency of model vascular-targeted carriers (VTCs) to the wall in physiological blood flows. Specifically, the adhesion of sLe A -coated nano- and micro-spheres to inflamed endothelial cells monolayers were conducted via a parallel plate flow chamber assay with steady and disturbed red blood cells (RBCs)-in-buffer and whole blood flows of common animal models. Our results suggest that the ratio of carrier size to RBC size dictate particle binding in blood flow. Additionally, the presence of white blood cells affects the trend of particle adhesion depending on the animal species. Overall, this work sheds light on some deviation in VTC vascular wall interaction results obtained with in vivo animal experimentation from expected outcome and efficiency in vivo in human.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/srep11631
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4481524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1899485717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6980006da91fd7303d712d68a7947d3a281136405a49dda24d453d2be2480a083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkV9rFDEUxYMottQ--AUk4IsKo_k3M8mLUEqtQsEX9TXcmdyZTZlJ1mSmut_elG2XVQMh4d5fTs7lEPKSs_ecSf0hJ9xy3kj-hJwKpupKSCGeHt1PyHnOt6ysWhjFzXNyIhrOZSmckt9Xw4D9QuNAf0DysPgYqA90g3NMG4xTHHe0w-UXYimuMwQKwZXtZ5hoN8XoaHmxbJB2PjgfRorD4Hvod_ead5D7dYJULZBGXNDRHlLymPIL8myAKeP5w3lGvn-6-nb5ubr5ev3l8uKm6mumlqoxuvhsHBg-uFYy6VouXKOhNap1EoQukzSK1aCMcyCUU7V0okOhNAOm5Rn5uNfdrt2MrsewJJjsNpUB0s5G8PbvTvAbO8Y7q5TmtVBF4M2DQIo_V8yLnX3ucZogYFyz5Y3htdHa8IK-_ge9jWsKZTzLtTFK1y1vC_V2T_Up5pLecDDDmb2P1B4iLeyrY_cH8jHAArzbA7m0wojp6Mv_1P4AMBerMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899485717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Variation in hemorheology between human and animal blood on the binding efficacy of vascular-targeted carriers</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Namdee, K. ; Carrasco-Teja, M. ; Fish, M. B. ; Charoenphol, P. ; Eniola-Adefeso, O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Namdee, K. ; Carrasco-Teja, M. ; Fish, M. B. ; Charoenphol, P. ; Eniola-Adefeso, O.</creatorcontrib><description>Animal models are extensively used to evaluate the in vivo functionality of novel drug delivery systems (DDS). However, many variations likely exist in vivo between the animals and human physiological environment that significantly alter results obtained with animal models relative to human system. To date, it is not clear if the variation in hemorheology and hemodynamics between common animal and human models affect the functionality of DDS. This study investigates the role of hemorheology of humans and various animal models in dictating the binding efficiency of model vascular-targeted carriers (VTCs) to the wall in physiological blood flows. Specifically, the adhesion of sLe A -coated nano- and micro-spheres to inflamed endothelial cells monolayers were conducted via a parallel plate flow chamber assay with steady and disturbed red blood cells (RBCs)-in-buffer and whole blood flows of common animal models. Our results suggest that the ratio of carrier size to RBC size dictate particle binding in blood flow. Additionally, the presence of white blood cells affects the trend of particle adhesion depending on the animal species. Overall, this work sheds light on some deviation in VTC vascular wall interaction results obtained with in vivo animal experimentation from expected outcome and efficiency in vivo in human.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep11631</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26113000</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>13 ; 13/31 ; 631/61/54/152 ; 639/166/985 ; 639/925/350/354 ; Adult ; Animal models ; Animals ; Blood flow ; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Cell Adhesion ; Cell Size ; Cells, Cultured ; Drug Carriers - chemistry ; Drug Carriers - metabolism ; Drug delivery ; Drug Delivery Systems - methods ; Endothelial cells ; Erythrocytes ; Erythrocytes - metabolism ; Hemodynamics ; Hemodynamics - physiology ; Hemorheology - physiology ; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells - metabolism ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Leukocytes ; Mice ; Microspheres ; Monte Carlo Method ; multidisciplinary ; Nanospheres - chemistry ; Particle Size ; Physiology ; Rabbits ; Science ; Species Specificity ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2015-06, Vol.5 (1), p.11631-11631, Article 11631</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jun 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6980006da91fd7303d712d68a7947d3a281136405a49dda24d453d2be2480a083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6980006da91fd7303d712d68a7947d3a281136405a49dda24d453d2be2480a083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1899485717/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1899485717?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,730,783,787,888,25767,27938,27939,37026,37027,44604,53806,53808,75462</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26113000$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Namdee, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-Teja, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fish, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charoenphol, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eniola-Adefeso, O.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Variation in hemorheology between human and animal blood on the binding efficacy of vascular-targeted carriers</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Animal models are extensively used to evaluate the in vivo functionality of novel drug delivery systems (DDS). However, many variations likely exist in vivo between the animals and human physiological environment that significantly alter results obtained with animal models relative to human system. To date, it is not clear if the variation in hemorheology and hemodynamics between common animal and human models affect the functionality of DDS. This study investigates the role of hemorheology of humans and various animal models in dictating the binding efficiency of model vascular-targeted carriers (VTCs) to the wall in physiological blood flows. Specifically, the adhesion of sLe A -coated nano- and micro-spheres to inflamed endothelial cells monolayers were conducted via a parallel plate flow chamber assay with steady and disturbed red blood cells (RBCs)-in-buffer and whole blood flows of common animal models. Our results suggest that the ratio of carrier size to RBC size dictate particle binding in blood flow. Additionally, the presence of white blood cells affects the trend of particle adhesion depending on the animal species. Overall, this work sheds light on some deviation in VTC vascular wall interaction results obtained with in vivo animal experimentation from expected outcome and efficiency in vivo in human.</description><subject>13</subject><subject>13/31</subject><subject>631/61/54/152</subject><subject>639/166/985</subject><subject>639/925/350/354</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood flow</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Cell Adhesion</subject><subject>Cell Size</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Drug Carriers - chemistry</subject><subject>Drug Carriers - metabolism</subject><subject>Drug delivery</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems - methods</subject><subject>Endothelial cells</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - metabolism</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - physiology</subject><subject>Hemorheology - physiology</subject><subject>Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Leukocytes</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microspheres</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nanospheres - chemistry</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNplkV9rFDEUxYMottQ--AUk4IsKo_k3M8mLUEqtQsEX9TXcmdyZTZlJ1mSmut_elG2XVQMh4d5fTs7lEPKSs_ecSf0hJ9xy3kj-hJwKpupKSCGeHt1PyHnOt6ysWhjFzXNyIhrOZSmckt9Xw4D9QuNAf0DysPgYqA90g3NMG4xTHHe0w-UXYimuMwQKwZXtZ5hoN8XoaHmxbJB2PjgfRorD4Hvod_ead5D7dYJULZBGXNDRHlLymPIL8myAKeP5w3lGvn-6-nb5ubr5ev3l8uKm6mumlqoxuvhsHBg-uFYy6VouXKOhNap1EoQukzSK1aCMcyCUU7V0okOhNAOm5Rn5uNfdrt2MrsewJJjsNpUB0s5G8PbvTvAbO8Y7q5TmtVBF4M2DQIo_V8yLnX3ucZogYFyz5Y3htdHa8IK-_ge9jWsKZTzLtTFK1y1vC_V2T_Up5pLecDDDmb2P1B4iLeyrY_cH8jHAArzbA7m0wojp6Mv_1P4AMBerMg</recordid><startdate>20150626</startdate><enddate>20150626</enddate><creator>Namdee, K.</creator><creator>Carrasco-Teja, M.</creator><creator>Fish, M. B.</creator><creator>Charoenphol, P.</creator><creator>Eniola-Adefeso, O.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150626</creationdate><title>Effect of Variation in hemorheology between human and animal blood on the binding efficacy of vascular-targeted carriers</title><author>Namdee, K. ; Carrasco-Teja, M. ; Fish, M. B. ; Charoenphol, P. ; Eniola-Adefeso, O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6980006da91fd7303d712d68a7947d3a281136405a49dda24d453d2be2480a083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>13</topic><topic>13/31</topic><topic>631/61/54/152</topic><topic>639/166/985</topic><topic>639/925/350/354</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood flow</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Cell Adhesion</topic><topic>Cell Size</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Drug Carriers - chemistry</topic><topic>Drug Carriers - metabolism</topic><topic>Drug delivery</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems - methods</topic><topic>Endothelial cells</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - metabolism</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - physiology</topic><topic>Hemorheology - physiology</topic><topic>Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Leukocytes</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microspheres</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nanospheres - chemistry</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Namdee, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-Teja, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fish, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charoenphol, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eniola-Adefeso, O.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Namdee, K.</au><au>Carrasco-Teja, M.</au><au>Fish, M. B.</au><au>Charoenphol, P.</au><au>Eniola-Adefeso, O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Variation in hemorheology between human and animal blood on the binding efficacy of vascular-targeted carriers</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2015-06-26</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11631</spage><epage>11631</epage><pages>11631-11631</pages><artnum>11631</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>Current Address: National Nanotechnology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, 111 Thailand Science Park,Phahonyothin Road, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.</notes><notes>These authors contributed equally to this work.</notes><abstract>Animal models are extensively used to evaluate the in vivo functionality of novel drug delivery systems (DDS). However, many variations likely exist in vivo between the animals and human physiological environment that significantly alter results obtained with animal models relative to human system. To date, it is not clear if the variation in hemorheology and hemodynamics between common animal and human models affect the functionality of DDS. This study investigates the role of hemorheology of humans and various animal models in dictating the binding efficiency of model vascular-targeted carriers (VTCs) to the wall in physiological blood flows. Specifically, the adhesion of sLe A -coated nano- and micro-spheres to inflamed endothelial cells monolayers were conducted via a parallel plate flow chamber assay with steady and disturbed red blood cells (RBCs)-in-buffer and whole blood flows of common animal models. Our results suggest that the ratio of carrier size to RBC size dictate particle binding in blood flow. Additionally, the presence of white blood cells affects the trend of particle adhesion depending on the animal species. Overall, this work sheds light on some deviation in VTC vascular wall interaction results obtained with in vivo animal experimentation from expected outcome and efficiency in vivo in human.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>26113000</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep11631</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2015-06, Vol.5 (1), p.11631-11631, Article 11631
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4481524
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 13
13/31
631/61/54/152
639/166/985
639/925/350/354
Adult
Animal models
Animals
Blood flow
Blood Flow Velocity - physiology
Cell Adhesion
Cell Size
Cells, Cultured
Drug Carriers - chemistry
Drug Carriers - metabolism
Drug delivery
Drug Delivery Systems - methods
Endothelial cells
Erythrocytes
Erythrocytes - metabolism
Hemodynamics
Hemodynamics - physiology
Hemorheology - physiology
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells - metabolism
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Inflammation
Leukocytes
Mice
Microspheres
Monte Carlo Method
multidisciplinary
Nanospheres - chemistry
Particle Size
Physiology
Rabbits
Science
Species Specificity
Swine
title Effect of Variation in hemorheology between human and animal blood on the binding efficacy of vascular-targeted carriers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-02T16%3A22%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Variation%20in%20hemorheology%20between%20human%20and%20animal%20blood%20on%20the%20binding%20efficacy%20of%20vascular-targeted%20carriers&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Namdee,%20K.&rft.date=2015-06-26&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11631&rft.epage=11631&rft.pages=11631-11631&rft.artnum=11631&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep11631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1899485717%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6980006da91fd7303d712d68a7947d3a281136405a49dda24d453d2be2480a083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899485717&rft_id=info:pmid/26113000&rfr_iscdi=true