Loading…

Phase I/II trial of 2‐weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil in metastatic esophageal cancer (JCOG0807)

We carried out a phase I/II trial of adding 2‐weekly docetaxel to cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) therapy (2‐weekly DCF regimen) in esophageal cancer patients to investigate its safety and antimetastatic activity. Patients received 2‐weekly docetaxel (30 mg/m2 [dose level (DL)1] or 40 mg/m2 [DL2] w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer science 2014-09, Vol.105 (9), p.1189-1195
Main Authors: Hironaka, Shuichi, Tsubosa, Yasuhiro, Mizusawa, Junki, Kii, Takayuki, Kato, Ken, Tsushima, Takahiro, Chin, Keisho, Tomori, Akihisa, Okuno, Tatsuya, Taniki, Toshikatsu, Ura, Takashi, Matsushita, Hisayuki, Kojima, Takashi, Doki, Yuichiro, Kusaba, Hitoshi, Fujitani, Kazumasa, Taira, Koichi, Seki, Shiko, Nakamura, Tsutomu, Kitagawa, Yuko
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We carried out a phase I/II trial of adding 2‐weekly docetaxel to cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) therapy (2‐weekly DCF regimen) in esophageal cancer patients to investigate its safety and antimetastatic activity. Patients received 2‐weekly docetaxel (30 mg/m2 [dose level (DL)1] or 40 mg/m2 [DL2] with a 3 + 3 design in phase I, on days 1 and 15) in combination with fixed‐dose CF (80 mg/m2 cisplatin, day 1; 800 mg/m2 fluorouracil, days 1–5) repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) in phase I and central peer review‐based response rate in phase II. At least 22 responders among 50 patients were required to satisfy the primary endpoint with a threshold of 35%. Sixty‐two patients were enrolled in phase I and II. In phase I, 10 patients were enrolled with DLT of 0/3 at DL1 and 2/7 in DL2. Considering DLT and treatment compliance, the recommended phase II dose was determined as DL1. In phase II, the response rate was 62% (P 
ISSN:1347-9032
1349-7006
DOI:10.1111/cas.12486