Is there a role for systemic targeted therapy after surgical treatment for metastases of renal cell carcinoma?

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma(m RCC) is a challenging disease. Despite the new targeted therapies, complete remissions occur only in 1%-3% of the cases, and the most effective first-line treatment drugs have reached a ceiling in overall survival(ranging from 9 to 49 mo). Metastasectomy remains to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of nephrology 2015-05, Vol.4 (2), p.254-262
Main Author: Alonso, Adrian Husillos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Minireviews
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Metastatic renal cell carcinoma(m RCC) is a challenging disease. Despite the new targeted therapies, complete remissions occur only in 1%-3% of the cases, and the most effective first-line treatment drugs have reached a ceiling in overall survival(ranging from 9 to 49 mo). Metastasectomy remains to be the only curative option in most patients with m RCC. Prognostic nomograms have been recently published, so we have tools to classify patients in risk groups, allowing us to detect the cases with the higher risk of recurrence after metastasectomy. Although sparse, there is some evidence of effectiveness of neoadjuvant targeted therapy before metastasectomy; but with an increase in surgical complications due to the effects of these new drugs in tissue healing. We have aimed to answer the question: Is there a role for systemic targeted therapy after surgical treatment for metastases of renal cell carcinoma? We have made a search in Pubmed database. As far as we know, evidence is low and it’s based in case reports and small series of patients treated with adjuvant drugs after neoadjuvant therapy plus metastasectomy in cases of partial response to initial systemic treatment. Despite the limitations and high risk of bias, promising results and cases with longterm survival with this approach have been described. Two ongoing clinical trials may answer the question that concerns us.
ISSN:2220-6124
2220-6124
DOI:10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.254