Are Normal Hips Being Labeled as Pathologic? A CT-based Method for Defining Normal Acetabular Coverage

Background Plain radiographic measures of the acetabulum may fail to accurately define coverage or pathomorphology such as impingement or dysplasia. CT scans might provide more precise measurements for overcoverage and undercoverage. However, a well-defined method for such CT-based measurements and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2015-04, Vol.473 (4), p.1247-1254
Main Authors: Larson, Christopher M., Moreau-Gaudry, Alexandre, Kelly, Bryan T., Thomas Byrd, J. W., Tonetti, Jérôme, Lavallee, Stephane, Chabanas, Laurence, Barrier, Guillaume, Bedi, Asheesh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acetabulum - anatomy & histology
Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging
Adult
Conservative Orthopedics
Female
Femur Head - anatomy & histology
Femur Head - diagnostic imaging
Hip
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Orthopedics
Reference Values
Sports Medicine
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Symposium: 2014 Bernese Hip Symposium
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Plain radiographic measures of the acetabulum may fail to accurately define coverage or pathomorphology such as impingement or dysplasia. CT scans might provide more precise measurements for overcoverage and undercoverage. However, a well-defined method for such CT-based measurements and normative data regarding CT-based acetabular coverage is lacking. Questions/purposes The purposes of the study were (1) to develop a method for evaluation of percent coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum; and (2) to define normative data using a cohort of asymptomatic patient hip and pelvic CT scans and evaluate the variability in acetabular version for asymptomatic patients with normal lateral coverage (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] 20°–40°) that has previously been defined as abnormal based on radiographic parameters. Methods Two-hundred thirty-seven patients (474 hips) with hip CT scans obtained for reasons other than hip-related pain were evaluated. The scans were obtained from a hospital database of patients who underwent CT evaluation of abdominal trauma or pain. In addition, hips with obvious dysplasia (LCEA < 20°) or profunda (LCE > 40°) were excluded resulting in a final cohort of 222 patients (409 hips [115 men, 107 women]) with CT scans and a mean age of 25 ± 3 years. CT scan alignment was corrected along the horizontal and vertical axis and percent acetabular coverage around the clockface (3 o’clock = anterior), and regional (anterior, superior, posterior) and global surface area coverage was determined. Percent coverage laterally was correlated with the LCEA and the presence and prevalence of cranial retroversion (crossover sign) and a positive posterior wall sign were determined. Results The mean regional percent femoral head surface area coverage for the asymptomatic cohort was 40% ± 2% anteriorly, 61% ± 3% superiorly, and 48% ± 3% posteriorly. Mean global coverage of the femoral head was 40% ± 2%. The local coverage anteriorly (3 o’clock) was 38% ± 3%, laterally (12 o’clock) was 67% ± 2%, and posteriorly (9 o’clock) was 52% ± 3%. The mean lateral coverage represented a mean LCEA of 31° (± 1 SD). Fifteen percent of hips demonstrated cranial retroversion that would correlate with a crossover sign, and 30% had < 50% posterior coverage that would correlate with a positive posterior wall sign on an anteroposterior pelvis radiograph. In addition, male hips had a higher prevalence of a crossover sign (19%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14%–2
ISSN:0009-921X
1528-1132
DOI:10.1007/s11999-014-4055-2