Loading…

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Is Related to Abnormalities in Myocardial Structure and Function in Cardiac Amyloidosis

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that coronary microvascular function is impaired in subjects with cardiac amyloidosis. Background Effort angina is common in subjects with cardiac amyloidosis, even in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD). Me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JACC. Heart failure 2014-08, Vol.2 (4), p.358-367
Main Authors: Dorbala, Sharmila, MD, Vangala, Divya, MA, Bruyere, John, MA, Quarta, Christina, MD, Kruger, Jenna, BS, Padera, Robert, MD, Foster, Courtney, MSc, CNMT, Hanley, Michael, MD, Di Carli, Marcelo F., MD, Falk, Rodney, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that coronary microvascular function is impaired in subjects with cardiac amyloidosis. Background Effort angina is common in subjects with cardiac amyloidosis, even in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Thirty-one subjects were prospectively enrolled in this study, including 21 subjects with definite cardiac amyloidosis without epicardial CAD and 10 subjects with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). All subjects underwent rest and vasodilator stress N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography and 2-dimensional echocardiography. Global left ventricular myocardial blood flow (MBF) was quantified at rest and during peak hyperemia, and coronary flow reserve (CFR) was computed (peak stress MBF/rest MBF) adjusting for rest rate pressure product. Results Compared with the LVH group, the amyloid group showed lower rest MBF (0.59 ± 0.15 ml/g/min vs. 0.88 ± 0.23 ml/g/min; p = 0.004), stress MBF (0.85 ± 0.29 ml/g/min vs. 1.85 ± 0.45 ml/g/min; p < 0.0001), and CFR (1.19 ± 0.38 vs. 2.23 ± 0.88; p < 0.0001) and higher minimal coronary vascular resistance (111 ± 40 ml/g/min/mm Hg vs. 70 ± 19 ml/g/min/mm Hg; p = 0.004). Of note, almost all subjects with amyloidosis (>95%) had significantly reduced peak stress MBF (
ISSN:2213-1779
2213-1787
DOI:10.1016/j.jchf.2014.03.009