Typification of the genus Dileptus Dujardin, 1841 (Ciliophora, Rhynchostomatia)
In their monograph of the dileptids, Vďačný and Foissner (2012) could not clarify the type species of the genus DileptusDujardin, 1841. Thus, they suggested that the problem be referred to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. However, recently we discovered that Dujardin (1841) h...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of protistology 2014-06, Vol.50 (3), p.314-317 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In their monograph of the dileptids, Vďačný and Foissner (2012) could not clarify the type species of the genus DileptusDujardin, 1841. Thus, they suggested that the problem be referred to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. However, recently we discovered that Dujardin (1841) has originally typified Dileptus with Amphileptus anser sensu Ehrenberg (1838) which is in fact a misidentified Amphileptus margaritiferEhrenberg, 1833, a common species also originally classified in Dileptus. Under Article 70.3.2 of the Code, Dileptus margaritifer (Ehrenberg, 1833) Dujardin, 1841, thoroughly redescribed by Foissner et al. (1995), is now the type of Dileptus. This has the great advantages of historical continuity and that new combinations (names) are not required. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0932-4739 1618-0429 |