Loading…
The relationship between eosinophilia and airway remodelling in mild asthma
Summary Background Eosinophilia is a marker of corticosteroid responsiveness and risk of exacerbation in asthma; although it has been linked to submucosal matrix deposition, its relationship with other features of airway remodelling is less clear. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical and experimental allergy 2013-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1342-1350 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Background
Eosinophilia is a marker of corticosteroid responsiveness and risk of exacerbation in asthma; although it has been linked to submucosal matrix deposition, its relationship with other features of airway remodelling is less clear.
Objective
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between airway eosinophilia and airway remodelling.
Methods
Bronchial biopsies from subjects (n = 20 in each group) with mild steroid‐naïve asthma, with either low (0–0.45 mm−2)) or high submucosal eosinophil (23.43–46.28 mm−2) counts and healthy controls were assessed for in vivo epithelial damage (using epidermal growth factor receptor staining), mucin expression, airway smooth muscle (ASM) hypertrophy and inflammatory cells within ASM.
Results
The proportion of in vivo damaged epithelium was significantly greater (P = 0.02) in the high‐eosinophil (27.37%) than the low‐eosinophil (4.14%) group. Mucin expression and goblet cell numbers were similar in the two eosinophil groups; however, MUC‐2 expression was increased (P = 0.002) in the high‐eosinophil group compared with controls. The proportion of submucosa occupied by ASM was higher in both asthma groups (P = 0.021 and P = 0.046) compared with controls. In the ASM, eosinophil and T‐lymphocyte numbers were higher (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0954-7894 1365-2222 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cea.12156 |