Controlling automatic imitative tendencies: Interactions between mirror neuron and cognitive control systems

Humans have an automatic tendency to imitate others. Although several regions commonly observed in social tasks have been shown to be involved in imitation control, there is little work exploring how these regions interact with one another. We used fMRI and dynamic causal modeling to identify imitat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2013-12, Vol.83, p.493-504
Main Authors: Cross, Katy A., Torrisi, Salvatore, Reynolds Losin, Elizabeth A., Iacoboni, Marco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Automatic imitation
Brain Mapping
Charitable foundations
Cognition - physiology
Cognitive ability
Cognitive control
Dynamic causal modeling
Feedback, Physiological - physiology
Female
fMRI
Frontal Lobe - physiology
Humans
Hypotheses
Imitative Behavior - physiology
Male
Medical imaging
Mirror neuron system
Mirror Neurons - physiology
Nerve Net - physiology
Reflex - physiology
Spatial compatibility
Studies
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Humans have an automatic tendency to imitate others. Although several regions commonly observed in social tasks have been shown to be involved in imitation control, there is little work exploring how these regions interact with one another. We used fMRI and dynamic causal modeling to identify imitation-specific control mechanisms and examine functional interactions between regions. Participants performed a pre-specified action (lifting their index or middle finger) in response to videos depicting the same two actions (biological cues) or dots moving with similar trajectories (non-biological cues). On congruent trials, the stimulus and response were similar (e.g. index finger response to index finger or left side dot stimulus), while on incongruent trials the stimulus and response were dissimilar (e.g. index finger response to middle finger or right side dot stimulus). Reaction times were slower on incongruent compared to congruent trials for both biological and non-biological stimuli, replicating previous findings that suggest the automatic imitative or spatially compatible (congruent) response must be controlled on incongruent trials. Neural correlates of the congruency effects were different depending on the cue type. The medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis (IFGpo) and the left anterior insula were involved specifically in controlling imitation. In addition, the IFGpo was also more active for biological compared to non-biological stimuli, suggesting that the region represents the frontal node of the human mirror neuron system (MNS). Effective connectivity analysis exploring the interactions between these regions, suggests a role for the mPFC and ACC in imitative conflict detection and the anterior insula in conflict resolution processes, which may occur through interactions with the frontal node of the MNS. We suggest an extension of the previous models of imitation control involving interactions between imitation-specific and general cognitive control mechanisms. •Automatic imitation and spatial compatibility show similar behavioral congruency.•Congruency effect neural correlates differ, indicating distinct control mechanisms.•Imitation control modulates activity in the frontal node of mirror neuron system.•Effect connectivity reveals interactions between general and specific mechanisms.
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.060