Setting a gold standard for quantification of leukoaraiosis burden in patients with ischemic stroke: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

•White matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden is a potent stroke risk factor.•Use of clinical MRI scans in research is fraught with methodological limitations.•Novel volumetric method overcomes limitations to quantify WMH in stroke patients.•It correlates highly with gold standard and is specific for WM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuroscience methods 2014-01, Vol.221, p.196-201
Main Authors: Rost, Natalia S., Sadaghiani, Saloomeh, Biffi, Alessandro, Fitzpatrick, Kaitlin M., Cloonan, Lisa, Rosand, Jonathan, Shibata, Dean K., Mosley, Thomas H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
All cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Brain - pathology
Female
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - standards
Leukoaraiosis
Leukoaraiosis - complications
Leukoaraiosis - epidemiology
Leukoaraiosis - pathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Small vessel stroke
Stroke - complications
Stroke - pathology
Volumetric MRI
White matter hyperintensity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•White matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden is a potent stroke risk factor.•Use of clinical MRI scans in research is fraught with methodological limitations.•Novel volumetric method overcomes limitations to quantify WMH in stroke patients.•It correlates highly with gold standard and is specific for WMH in ischemic stroke.•Accuracy of clinical MRI assessment is important for future large-scale studies. Accurate and reliable measurement of leukoaraiosis, or MR-detected white, matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden in subjects with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is important for, ongoing research studies and future models of risk and outcome prediction, but the presence of a, cerebral infarct may complicate measurement. We sought to assess accuracy of a volumetric method, designed to measure WMH in AIS subjects as compared to the previously validated protocol. We randomly selected and equally sampled 120 brain scans from the Atherosclerosis, Risk in Communities (ARIC) MRI Study individuals within designated mild, moderate, and severe, tertiles of WMH volume (WMHV). T2 FLAIR axial images were analyzed using the AIS WMH volumetric, protocol and compared with the ARIC (gold standard) method. Pearson correlation coefficients, linear, concordance correlation coefficient, and Blant–Altman procedures were used to assess measurement, agreements between the two procedures. Median WMHV determined by using the ARIC method was 7.8cm3 (IQR 5.7–13.55) vs. 3.54cm3, (IQR 2.1–7.2) using the AIS WMH method. There was good correlation between the two measurements, (r=0.52, 0.67, and 0.9 for tertiles 1, 2, and 3 respectively) (p
ISSN:0165-0270
1872-678X
DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.009