White Americans' Genetic Lay Theories of Race Differences and Sexual Orientation: Their Relationship with Prejudice toward Blacks, and Gay Men and Lesbians

This study examined the relationship between White Americans' genetic explanations, conceptualized as genetic lay theories, for perceived racial differences and for sexual orientation, and attitudes toward Blacks, and gay men and lesbians, respectively. Considering contrasting public discourse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Group processes & intergroup relations 2006-01, Vol.9 (1), p.77-94
Main Authors: Jayaratne, Toby Epstein, Ybarra, Oscar, Sheldon, Jane P., Brown, Tony N., Feldbaum, Merle, Pfeffer, Carla A., Petty, Elizabeth M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
African-Americans
Blacks
Folk beliefs
Gays & lesbians
Genetic psychology
Genetics
Homosexuality
Homosexuals
Intergroup relations
Perceptions
Prejudice
Race
Racial Differences
Role prescriptions
Sex Role Orientations
Sexual orientation
Sexual Preferences
Sexuality
Social Attitudes
Social interaction
Social Theories
Stereotypes
Studies
U.S.A
Whites
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examined the relationship between White Americans' genetic explanations, conceptualized as genetic lay theories, for perceived racial differences and for sexual orientation, and attitudes toward Blacks, and gay men and lesbians, respectively. Considering contrasting public discourse surrounding race and sexual orientation, we predicted that genetic lay theories would be associated with greater prejudice toward Blacks, but less prejudice toward gay men and lesbians. The findings, based on a representative sample of 600 White Americans, were consistent with expectations. Results are discussed in relation to the literature on essentialism and implicit theories of the malleability of traits. The present research broadens our view of lay theories by showing how they support either prejudice or tolerance, depending on the target group.
ISSN:1368-4302
1461-7188
DOI:10.1177/1368430206059863