Medication intensification in diabetes in rural primary care: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial

Objective To determine the effectiveness of a provider-based intervention to improve medication intensification among patients with diabetes. Design Effectiveness cluster-randomised trial. Baseline and follow-up cross-sections of diabetes physicians’ patients. Setting Eleven U.S. Southeastern states...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open 2012-01, Vol.2 (5), p.e000959
Main Authors: Billue, Katherine L, Safford, Monika M, Salanitro, Amanda H, Houston, Thomas K, Curry, William, Kim, Yongin, Allison, Jeroan J, Estrada, Carlos A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Blood pressure
Diabetes
Intervention
Lipids
Medication Intensification Trial
Patients
Public health
Rural areas
Web sites
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To determine the effectiveness of a provider-based intervention to improve medication intensification among patients with diabetes. Design Effectiveness cluster-randomised trial. Baseline and follow-up cross-sections of diabetes physicians’ patients. Setting Eleven U.S. Southeastern states, 2006–2008. Participants 205 Rural primary care physicians, 95 completed the study. Intervention Multicomponent interactive intervention including web-based continuing medical education (CME), performance feedback and quality improvement tools. Primary outcome measures Medication intensification, a dose increase of an existing medication or the addition of a new class of medication for glucose, blood pressure and lipids control on any of the three most recent office visits. Results Of 364 physicians attempting to register, 102 were randomised to the intervention and 103 to the control arms; 95 physicians (intervention, n=48; control, n=47) provided data on their 1182 of their patients at baseline (intervention, n=715; control, n=467) and 945 patients at follow-up (intervention, n=479; control, n=466). For A1c control, medication intensification increased in both groups (intervention, pre 26.4% vs post 32.6%, p=0.022; control, pre 24.8% vs post 31.1%, p=0.033) (intervention, adjusted OR (AOR) 1.37; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.76; control, AOR 1.41 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.89)); however, we observed no incremental benefit solely due to the intervention (group-by-time interaction, p=0.948). Among patients with the worst glucose control (A1c >9%), intensification increased in both groups (intervention, pre 34.8% vs post 62.5%, p=0.002; control, pre 35.7% vs post 61.4%, p=0.008). Conclusions A wide-reach, low-intensity, web-based interactive multicomponent intervention had no significant incremental effect on medication intensification for control of glucose, blood pressure or lipids for patients with diabetes of physicians practising in the rural Southeastern USA. Trial registration NCT00403091.
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000959