Ethnic Differences in Arterial Wave Reflections and Normative Equations for Augmentation Index

Data regarding ethnic differences in wave reflections, which markedly affect the central pressure profile, are very limited. Furthermore, because age, heart rate, and body height are strong determinants of augmentation index, relating single measurements to normative data (in which augmentation inde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) Tex. 1979), 2011-06, Vol.57 (6), p.1108-1116
Main Authors: Chirinos, Julio A, Kips, Jan G, Roman, Mary J, Medina-Lezama, Josefina, Li, Yan, Woodiwiss, Angela J, Norton, Gavin R, Yasmin, Van Bortel, Luc, Wang, Ji-Guang, Cockcroft, John R, Devereux, Richard B, Wilkinson, Ian B, Segers, Patrick, McEniery, Carmel M
Format: Article
Language:eng
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Data regarding ethnic differences in wave reflections, which markedly affect the central pressure profile, are very limited. Furthermore, because age, heart rate, and body height are strong determinants of augmentation index, relating single measurements to normative data (in which augmentation index values correspond with average population values of its determinants) is challenging. We studied subject-level data from 10 550 adults enrolled in large population-based studies. In a healthy reference sample (n=3497), we assessed ethnic differences in augmentation index (ratio of second/first systolic peaks) and generated equations for adjusted z scores, allowing for a standardized comparison between individual augmentation index measurements and the normative population mean from subjects of the same age, sex, ethnic population, body height, and heart rate. After adjustment for age, body height, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure, African blacks (women154%; men138%) and Andean Hispanics (women152%; men133%) demonstrated higher central (aortic) augmentation index values than British whites (women140%; men128%), whereas American Indians (women133%; men122%) demonstrated lower augmentation index (all P
ISSN:0194-911X
1524-4563