Too much noise in the Times Higher Education rankings

Several individual indicators from the Times Higher Education Survey (THES) data base—the overall score, the reported staff-to-student ratio, and the peer ratings—demonstrate unacceptably high fluctuation from year to year. The inappropriateness of the summary tabulations for assessing the majority...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Scientometrics 2010-10, Vol.85 (1), p.295-299
Main Authors:	Bookstein, Fred L., Seidler, Horst, Fieder, Martin, Winckler, Georg
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Bibliometrics Computer Science Information Storage and Retrieval Library Science Scholarly publishing Universities
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Several individual indicators from the Times Higher Education Survey (THES) data base—the overall score, the reported staff-to-student ratio, and the peer ratings—demonstrate unacceptably high fluctuation from year to year. The inappropriateness of the summary tabulations for assessing the majority of the “top 200” universities would be apparent purely for reason of this obvious statistical instability regardless of other grounds of criticism. There are far too many anomalies in the change scores of the various indices for them to be of use in the course of university management.
ISSN:	0138-9130 1588-2861