Loading…

Prevention of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Approaches to Estimating and Reducing Risk

Background It is uncertain whether evidence supports routinely estimating a postmenopausal woman's risk of breast cancer and intervening to reduce risk. Methods We systematically reviewed prospective studies about models and sex hormone levels to assess breast cancer risk and used meta-analysis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009-03, Vol.101 (6), p.384-398
Main Authors: Cummings, Steven R., Tice, Jeffrey A., Bauer, Scott, Browner, Warren S., Cuzick, Jack, Ziv, Elad, Vogel, Victor, Shepherd, John, Vachon, Celine, Smith-Bindman, Rebecca, Kerlikowske, Karla
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background It is uncertain whether evidence supports routinely estimating a postmenopausal woman's risk of breast cancer and intervening to reduce risk. Methods We systematically reviewed prospective studies about models and sex hormone levels to assess breast cancer risk and used meta-analysis with random effects models to summarize the predictive accuracy of breast density. We also reviewed prospective studies of the effects of exercise, weight management, healthy diet, moderate alcohol consumption, and fruit and vegetable intake on breast cancer risk, and used random effects models for a meta-analyses of tamoxifen and raloxifene for primary prevention of breast cancer. All studies reviewed were published before June 2008, and all statistical tests were two-sided. Results Risk models that are based on demographic characteristics and medical history had modest discriminatory accuracy for estimating breast cancer risk (c-statistics range = 0.58–0.63). Breast density was strongly associated with breast cancer (relative risk [RR] = 4.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.10 to 5.26, for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category IV vs category I; RR = 4.20, 95% CI = 3.61 to 4.89, for >75% vs
ISSN:0027-8874
1460-2105
DOI:10.1093/jnci/djp018