Loading…

Can the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted?

Purpose Pelvic-floor rehabilitation does not provide the same degree of relief in all fecal incontinent patients. We aimed at studying prospectively the ability of tests to predict the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence. Materials and methods Two hundred fifty...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of colorectal disease 2008-05, Vol.23 (5), p.503-511
Main Authors: Terra, M. P., Deutekom, M., Dobben, A. C., Baeten, C. G. M. I., Janssen, L. W. M., Boeckxstaens, G. E. E., Engel, A. F., Felt-Bersma, R. J. F., Slors, J. F. W., Gerhards, M. F., Bijnen, A. B., Everhardt, E., Schouten, W. R., Berghmans, B., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Stoker, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Pelvic-floor rehabilitation does not provide the same degree of relief in all fecal incontinent patients. We aimed at studying prospectively the ability of tests to predict the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence. Materials and methods Two hundred fifty consecutive patients (228 women) underwent medical history and a standardized series of tests, including physical examination, anal manometry, pudendal nerve latency testing, anal sensitivity testing, rectal capacity measurement, defecography, endoanal sonography, and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, patients were referred for pelvic-floor rehabilitation. Outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation was quantified by the Vaizey incontinence score. Linear regression analyses were used to identify candidate predictors and to construct a multivariable prediction model for the posttreatment Vaizey score. Results After pelvic-floor rehabilitation, the mean baseline Vaizey score (18, SD ± 3) was reduced with 3.2 points ( p  
ISSN:0179-1958
1432-1262
DOI:10.1007/s00384-008-0438-8