Loading…

Capecitabine and irinotecan with and without bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer patients

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of cape- citabine plus irinotecan + bevacizumab in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: Forty six patients with previously untreated, locally-advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were recruited between 2001-2006 in a pro-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2009-01, Vol.15 (4), p.449-456
Main Authors: Moehler, Markus, Sprinzl, Martin-F, Abdelfattah, Murad, Schimanski, Carl-C, Adami, Bernd, Godderz, Werner, Majer, Klaus, Flieger, Dimitri, Teufel, Andreas, Siebler, Juergen, Hoehler, Thomas, Galle, Peter-R, Kanzler, Stephan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of cape- citabine plus irinotecan + bevacizumab in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: Forty six patients with previously untreated, locally-advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were recruited between 2001-2006 in a pro- spective open-label phase Ⅱ trial, in German commu- nity-based outpatient clinics. Patients received a stan- dard capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) or CAPIRI plus bevacizumab (CAPIRI-BEV) regimen every 3 wk. Dose reductions were mandatory from the first cycle in cases of 〉 grade 2 toxicity. The treatment choice of bevacizumab was at the discretion of the physician. The primary endpoints were response and toxicity and sec- ondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: In the CAPIRI group vs the CAPRI-Bev group there were more female than male patients (47% vs 24%), and more patients had colon as the primary tumor site (58.8% vs 48.2%) with fewer patients having sigmoid colon as primary tumor site (5.9% vs 20.7%). Grade 3/4 toxicity was higher with CAPIRI than CAPIRI-Bev: 82% vs 58.6%. Partial response rates were 29.4% and 34.5%, and tumor control rates were 70.6% and 75.9%, respectively. No complete re- sponses were observed. The median progression-free survival was 11.4 mo and 12.8 mo for CAPIRI and CA- PIRI-Bev, respectively. The median overall survival for CAPIRI was 15 mo (458 d) and for CAPIRI-Bev 24 mo (733 d). These differences were not statistically different. In the CAPIRI-Bev, group, two patients under- went a full secondary tumor resection after treatment, whereas in the CAPIRI group no cases underwent this procedure. CONCLUSION: Both regimens were well tolerated and offered effective tumor growth control in this out- patient setting. Severe gastrointestinal toxicities and thromboembolic events were rare and if observed were never fatal.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.15.449