Synaptic physiology of the flow of information in the cat's visual cortex in vivo

Each stage of the striate cortical circuit extracts novel information about the visual environment. We asked if this analytic process reflected laminar variations in synaptic physiology by making whole-cell recording with dye-filled electrodes from the cat's visual cortex and thalamus; the stim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of physiology 2002-04, Vol.540 (1), p.335-350
Main Authors: Hirsch, Judith A., Martinez, Luis M., Alonso, José‐Manuel, Desai, Komal, Pillai, Cinthi, Pierre, Carhine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Action Potentials - physiology
Animals
Cats
Cell Size - physiology
Dendrites - physiology
Neurons - physiology
Neurons - ultrastructure
Original
Photic Stimulation
Synapses - physiology
Thalamus - cytology
Visual Cortex - cytology
Visual Cortex - physiology
Visual Pathways - cytology
Visual Pathways - physiology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Each stage of the striate cortical circuit extracts novel information about the visual environment. We asked if this analytic process reflected laminar variations in synaptic physiology by making whole-cell recording with dye-filled electrodes from the cat's visual cortex and thalamus; the stimuli were flashed spots. Thalamic afferents terminate in layer 4, which contains two types of cell, simple and complex, distinguished by the spatial structure of the receptive field. Previously, we had found that the postsynaptic and spike responses of simple cells reliably followed the time course of flash-evoked thalamic activity. Here we report that complex cells in layer 4 (or cells intermediate between simple and complex) similarly reprised thalamic activity (response/trial, 99 ± 1.9 %; response duration 159 ± 57 ms; latency 25 ± 4 ms; average ± standard deviation; n = 7). Thus, all cells in layer 4 share a common synaptic physiology that allows secure integration of thalamic input. By contrast, at the second cortical stage (layer 2+3), where layer 4 directs its output, postsynaptic responses did not track simple patterns of antecedent activity. Typical responses to the static stimulus were intermittent and brief (response/trial, 31 ± 40 %; response duration 72 ± 60 ms, latency 39 ± 7 ms; n = 11). Only richer stimuli like those including motion evoked reliable responses. All told, the second level of cortical processing differs markedly from the first. At that later stage, ascending information seems strongly gated by connections between cortical neurons. Inputs must be combined in newly specified patterns to influence intracortical stages of processing.
ISSN:0022-3751
1469-7793
DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2001.012777