Primary care for patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus: A randomized controlled trial

To measure the impact of a teaching intervention and to compare process and outcomes of care for HIV-infected patients randomly assigned to a general medicine clinic (GMC) or an infectious disease clinic (IDC) for primary care. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. University hospital in Durham...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2001-09, Vol.16 (9), p.573-582
Main Authors: KEITZ, Sheri A, BOX, Tamara L, HOMAN, Rick K, BARTLETT, John A, ODDONE, Eugene Z
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
AIDS
Ambulatory care
Biological and medical sciences
Continuity of Patient Care - organization & administration
Family Practice - education
Female
HIV
HIV Infections - economics
HIV Infections - therapy
Hospitals, University
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Immune system
Immunodeficiencies
Immunodeficiencies. Immunoglobulinopathies
Immunopathology
Infectious diseases
Informed consent
Internal medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Medicine
North Carolina
Original
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital - statistics & numerical data
Patients
Physicians
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Primary care
Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Specialization
Utilization Review
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To measure the impact of a teaching intervention and to compare process and outcomes of care for HIV-infected patients randomly assigned to a general medicine clinic (GMC) or an infectious disease clinic (IDC) for primary care. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. University hospital in Durham, NC. Two hundred fourteen consecutive HIV-infected patients presenting for primary care. Physicians at the GMC received HIV-related training and evidence-based practice guidelines. Utilization of services, health-related quality of life, preventive and screening measures, and antiretroviral use for one year. At baseline GMC patients were more likely to be African American (85% vs 71%; P =.03) and had lower baseline CD4+ cell counts than IDC patients (262 +/- 269 vs 329 +/- 275; P =.05). A similar and high proportion of patients in both groups received appropriate preventive care services including Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis, pneumococcal vaccination, and antiretroviral therapy. Screening for TB was more frequent in GMC (89% vs 68%; P =.001). In the year following randomization, GMC patients made more visits to the emergency department than IDC patients (1.6 +/- 3.0 vs 0.7 +/- 1.5; P =.05). Hospital use was higher for GMC patients with average length of stay 7.8 +/- 6.3 days compared to 5.7 +/- 3.8 days for IDC patients (P =.01). In analyses, which adjust for potential baseline imbalances, these differences remained. Targeted education in GMC achieved similar provision of primary care for GMC patients, yet use of health care services was higher for this group. The delivery of adequate primary care is necessary but not sufficient to produce changes in health care utilization.
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
DOI:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009573.x